Coupe or rag top?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Coupe or rag top?



At 03:02 PM 8/6/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>D^2
>  I agree with you on your take of convertibles, although I personally have
>nothing against them.

Arran, nobody has anything against them!  They just make no sense to 
me.  But if somebody likes them, great!  I guess there is a car for 
everybody.  I was reading a CarLife road test of a 66 Chrysler 300.  The 
testers did not like the car, but respected its power and handling.  At the 
end they said: " if we all liked the same thing, we all would be married to 
the same woman".

>All of this for a sunny summer weekend
>driver that weighs more then a sedan but is less practical then a business
>coupe and less fun then a motorcycle.

It seems that the 1968 Imperial buying crowed agree with us.  Out of 
~15,000 cars, only 470 or so were ragtops.  My guess is that most of those 
who bought the ragtops, did not rely on that very car for their primary 
transportation.  Given that these cars were so expensive, the ragtop crowd 
may have been "spoiled" rich folks! ;) (nothing wrong with that, wish I was 
one of them too).  My biggest objections except for the obvious poor wether 
protection  is lack of safety, and loss of performance (not only due excess 
weight, but also due to added aerodynamic drag, even with the top up, at 
high speed the top will expand seriously adding drag).

>Carrying your logic to the extreme, a sedan should be worth
>a lot more than a coupe, because it's more practical.
>
>--Roger van Hoy,

R, the loss of practicality between a ragtop and a coupe seems to me far 
more radical than from a coupe to a 4 door.  If I had a family though, I 
would definitely try to avoid a 2 door.  So, yes, in that case, the 4 door 
would have had more value for me (remember, value is a relative term).

The only convertible I have ridden in was a friend's Miata.  I do not know 
if this qualifies for the thrill you are talking about.  The most 
interesting  deal with that car is that you felt it was far faster than it 
really was (which was not due to the lack of roof, as due to its small 
size, and windy little engine).  Later I raced the guy with my Imperial (I 
only had the sedan at the time), and I was amazed how easily I outran 
him.  In fact, I though he wasn't really trying to race me, but he admitted 
he was!
D^2, 2x68s




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.