I know this is not Imperial related, but.... "....having allowed Plymouth to wither on the vine, ..." applies to the premerger Chrysler Corporation, not DC. Below is a list of a number of car lines introduced by Chrysler between 1975 and 2000. Name the Plymouth version : Chrysler Cordoba / Dodge Charger SE ./ Plymouth ______________ * Dodge Diplomat / Chrysler LeBaron / Plymouth _____________ Chrysler Cordoba / Dodge Mirada / Plymouth ______________ * Chrysler LeBaron / Dodge 400 ./ Plymouth ______________ Chrysler LeBaron GTS / Dodge Lancer / Plymouth ______________ Chrysler Laser / Dodge Daytona./ Plymouth ______________ 1979 Chrysler Newport / 1979 Dodge St.Regis./ 1979 Plymouth ______________ * 1983 Chrysler E-Class / 1983 Dodge 600./ 1983 Plymouth ______________ Chrysler New Yorker / Dodge Dynasty / Plymouth ______________ 1990 Dodge Monaco / 1990 Plymouth ______________ Chrysler Concord / Dodge Intrepid / Eagle Vision / Plymouth ______________ Chrysler Sebring / Dodge Avenger / Plymouth ______________ Name one Plymouth line, other than the Prowler, that was not shared with another Chrysler make. The three lines with '*' do not apply to Canadians - all three were Caravelle. The 1975 Chrysler Cordoba was originally meant to to be Plymouth Sebring, by the way. In 1992 the top two series of the Acclaim became the bottom two series of the LeBaron. Sales of the Acclaim dropped 20,041 (20.6%) while the LeBaron gained 16,113. By 1998, Plymouth had but three car lines, Neon, Breeze and Prowler. Of Plymouth's historical competition, Chevrolet had seven car lines with Plymouth having no competition for the Prizm, Camaro, Lumina, Monte Carlo and Corvette.. Ford had five car lines, with Plymouth having no competitors for the Mustang, Taurus and Crown Victoria. Neither had anyhing to compete with the Prowler, though. When Dieter arrived at Auburn Hills, he gave the post mortem for the death of the Plymouth. All he had was a corpse by then and the demise of the Plymouth was something the American auto press had been forecasting (and Chrysler denying) since the early 1990's. Bill Vancouver, BC ----- Original Message ----- From: Hugh & Therese To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 9:53 AM Subject: IML: Marketing an Imperial Rich wrote: Because "IMPERIAL" name stands above the rest, and if Chrysler marketed the car properly it would be a great success. I reply: Sir, if you believe that DCA is capable of marketing yet another brand when it is doing such a poor job with its remaining lines, having allowed Plymouth to wither on the vine, then you must be one of the most optimistic people on this planet. Hugh