John----- Original Message ----- From: "Klebert L. Hall" <swampyankee@xxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 4:37 AM Subject: Re: IML: '65 engine choice - economics likely to decide?
Subject: Re: IML: Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:40:52 -0500 From: randalpark@xxxxxxx I wasn't going to say anything, but I agree with Kenyon on this. A 1965 Imperial was a great car and the engine it came with workedjust fine. I can see no real advantage to installing the 440 over the 413.It's true, the difference is only 10hp and 10 lb-ft.Now, if you were going to go more custom with the car and wanted to supe up the engine, there are a lot of 440 hi-performance parts out there, and it's probably be easier and cheaper to do that with a 440 instead of a 413.-Kle. '69 Crown 4DHT ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for theAdministrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm