Re: IML: '65 engine choice - economics likely to decide?

["Klebert L. Hall" <swampyankee@xxxxxxx>]

> Subject: Re: IML: Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:40:52 -0500
> From: randalpark@xxxxxxx
>
> I wasn't going to say anything, but I agree with Kenyon on this.
> A 1965 Imperial was a great car and the engine it came with worked
> just fine. I can see no real advantage to installing the 440 over the 413.


   It's true, the difference is only 10hp and 10 lb-ft.
   Now, if you were going to go more custom with the car and wanted to supe 
up the engine, there are a lot of 440 hi-performance parts out there, and 
it's probably be easier and cheaper to do that with a 440 instead of a 413.
      -Kle.
      '69 Crown 4DHT 




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm