Re: IML: 1960 Imperial. Why was it a one year only design?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: 1960 Imperial. Why was it a one year only design?
- From: Kenyon Wills <imperialist1960@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 18:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
--- Greg and Russell <65luxuryliner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'd like to ask the List why was this striking car a
one year only design?
======
1. Transition to new mfg plant screwed things up and
it was a manufacturing/design hiccup:
http://imperialclub.com/Yr/1960/Warren/Plant.htm
2. Moving fast and hard to follow up the initial
success of the 57-59 cars, with more radical changes
to follow for 1961 and then BOOM - fire Exner mid
stream and bring in Engel for squareness, so the 61
had to be massaged for a couple of years until the
boxcars came in? Those freestanding headlights
(beautiful as they are) must have been pretty much
over the top for a 1960's corporation....
3. To make the 196o restorer's life even harsher 45
years later?
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network