Re: IML: 68 imperial update

[Christopher H <imperial67@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the handy interchange information, but just for the record the 67
and 68 taillamps are not set up the same. In 67 all three bulbs in each lamp
are the same dual-filament type (so the turn signals and brakes illuminate
all three bulbs, as do the taillamps). In 68, the inner bulb was taillamp
only.

Just an FYI! Good to know the #97 bulb works where the #1095 was specified,
though.

Chris in LA
67 Crown
78 NYB Salon


On 5/12/05 6:01 PM, BOBSMOPAR (bobsmopar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> Hi all.
> A while back there was talk about the center 2 tail lights being to bright and
> that we needed 1095 light bulbs.
> After searching every part store in town I have found out that they do not
> make these light bulbs anymore.
> So I bought a set of number 97 light bulbs and put them in and now I have all
> the lights in the back all the same brightness.
> Hope this helps anyone else that has this problem with there 67 or 68.
> Bob Hanekamp
> I will be coming back to Carlisle this year I will have the Imperial unless I
> sell it before the show in July.




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm