RE: 64' Dodge 440 max wedge

["Steve Stasko Jr." <sixpakdodge@xxxxxxxxx>]

65 too?

--- Brian Schlump <jsbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Steve,
> 
> The '64 426 street wedge cars had only 2 emergency
> brake cable 
> guides...Brian
> 
> Steve Stasko Jr. wrote:
> > 
> > There is nothing that upsets me more than when my
> age
> > is brought into this. I have talked with people
> who
> > thought I was in my 40's. Therefore, I try not to
> > bring my age up because some people cannot accept
> the
> > fact I am 16. 
> > 
> > Dave, The car's been with us for 11 years now. We
> were
> > told it was a race car from day one and Mr. Lau's
> > mechanic represented it as a Max Wedge this
> summer.
> > $10,500 for this car was cheap even 11 years ago.
> > 
> > Jason, I'm with you on the Coronet part, My 65 has
> a
> > 440 in it now and I wouldn't have it any other
> way.
> > 
> > No one "ruffled my feathers", I learned alot of
> info
> > already and now know the proper things to look
> for.
> > Are the 4 e-brake mounts on Street Wedges also?
> > 
> > -Steve
> > 
> > --- Donnie Schanz Jr <dcs426@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > I am sorry. I did not mean to imply that
> somebody
> > > did give him static. I was 
> > > simply trying to inform the club that he is a
> very
> > > young member. It is hard 
> > > to tell from e-mails how old some of us are.
> > > Sometimes a statement can be 
> > > misinterpruted such as mine was.
> > > Sorry
> > > Donnie
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Dave Walters" <whdavid@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <1962to1965mopars@>
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 12:36 AM
> > > Subject: RE: 64' Dodge 440 max wedge
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jason Chance wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm not sure why you are saying to "cut Steve
> > > some slack". We answered
> > > >> his questions. No static or negativity was
> stated
> > > or implied. No
> > > >> derogatory statements were made.  It seems to
> me
> > > that some people got
> > > >> their feathers ruffled over nothing. I
> thought
> > > the purpose of this group
> > > >>
> > > >> was to help each other out with the facts.
> > > >>
> > > >> I don't want to see Steve get "had" by
> someone if
> > > they are trying to
> > > >> misrepresent a car. Best he knows the truth,
> for
> > > his own protection.
> > > >>
> > > >> For the record I could care less about the
> > > "correct reflector" crowd. I
> > > >> have a factory 318 65 coronet which now has a
> > > hopped up 413 in it. I
> > > >> love it. It is not for sale and I will drive
> it
> > > till I die.
> > > >>
> > > >> The important thing is not to get "had" by
> the
> > > numerous unscrupulous
> > > >> "max wedge" "a990" people that have recently
> > > surfaced. Also to not
> > > >> mistakenly misrepresent your car to someone
> else.
> > > It is up to us to
> > > >> watch out for each other. That was my only
> goal
> > > in answering Steve's
> > > >> questions.
> > > >>
> > > >> Nobody said anything negative about 4 door
> cars
> > > either, so I am not sure
> > > >>
> > > >> where that BS came from.
> > > >>
> > > >> Jason
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Couldn't agree with Jason's comment more.All
> dead
> > > on,every bit of
> > > > it,AFAIC!.Esp the part about taking advantage
> of
> > > someone.Steve contacted
> > > > me off list regarding this car and all the
> issues
> > > were worked
> > > > out,hopefully to his understanding.He is a
> victim
> > > here,esp if he paid a
> > > > premium for the car.
> > > >
> > > > I also appologized if I personally made it
> sound
> > > like a pi**ing
> > > > contest,which I had no intention of doing.I
> was
> > > merely stating the facts
> > > > as best I know them.I only wish we were all
> there
> > > for him BEFORE the
> > > > sale.
> > > >
> > > >  Dave Walters
> > > >  Denver, Co.
> > > >
> > > >  64 Savoy Post
> > > >  64 Bel Post
> > > >  64 Dodge 330 Post
> > > >  63 Savoy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----
> > > > Please address private mail -- mail of
> interest to
> > > only one person --  
> > > > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car
> > > transactions and 
> > > > negotiations as well as other personal
> messages
> > > only to the intended 
> > > > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public
> address.
> > > This practice will protect 
> > > > your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail
> and
> > > fine tune the content 
> > > > signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> > > >
> > >
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----
> > > Please address private mail -- mail of interest
> to
> > > only one person -- directly to that person. 
> I.e.,
> > > send parts/car transactions and negotiations as
> well
> > > as other personal messages only to the intended
> > > recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address.
> This
> > > practice will protect your privacy, reduce the
> total
> > > volume of mail and fine tune the content signal
> to
> > > Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > > 
> > > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> Guidelines:
> > >
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

bSONJP. 
Or send an email to: 1962to1965mopars-unsubscribe@