|
I work on new cars everyday and yes the safety equipment is definitely a
plus, crumple zones, seat belts (which all of my old cars have installed),
collapsible steering columns, air bags, ect. but there is noooo way in
hell that new Malibu (which by the way I'm a Body Shop manager in a Chevy
dealership, I've had them apart), could rip thru a full frame car like that. I'd
put that '59 up against two new Malibus and throw an Aveo in just for the hell
of it.It's a "Look how safe we make you, now give us your money" ad. Next thing
you know the cry-baby a$$holes will use that video to push their clunker bills.
What a bunch of B.S.
Adam Lindenbaum
An
eye-opener of a test, but couldn't they have proven their point just as well
by destroying an UGLY old car instead, like a '59 Lincoln? : ^)
________________________
Greg Robertson
Principal+Creative Director
PowerFlite Communications
53 Upton Street
Quincy, MA 02169-1120
P: 617.803.1274
F: 617.687.0226
On Oct 19, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Fr. Ray Ball wrote:
On the 50th Anniversary of the Insurance
Institute of Highway Safety.
1959 vs. 2009 in a crash
test:
Would a Forward Look car fare any
better?
Ray from NH
'58 Belvedere
'59 Star Chief
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
*************************************************************
To unsubscribe or set your subscription options,
please go to
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=l-forwardlook&A=1
|
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network