Re: [FWDLK] fake Adventurer?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FWDLK] fake Adventurer?



Hi All!  And a Very Merry Christmas!

In the spirit of Christmas, let me say that I too saw the DeSoto on line and sent a note to the dealer questioning its authenticity (no reply as yet) - but  regardless of its authenticity and colors - it sure is a nice looking FWDLK hardtop!  The DeSotos in 57 were arguably the best looking along with the Chrysler 2dr h/ts out of the whole corporate lineup.

If someone wanted to buy this car, they should inspect it physically, then deal with the owner re its pedigree. I'll bet the owner didn't know if it was a true Adventurer either and a careful buyer could probably make a good deal for that car.

Brian
57D500s in white frozen Michigan



Ross Klein wrote:
Hi, Forward Lookers

Aside from everything else that's wrong with this car, I believe '57
Adventurers were all either black, gold, or white with corresponding
two-toning in white, gold or black. I've only seen one interior, which was
basically gold with black and white trim. About the only thing "Adventurous"
about this car is the carburation (and maybe the asking price!).

Happy Holidays to all,

Ross Klein
'60 DeSoto Adventurer (a real one)
'56 Imperial sedan
'Life's too short to drive 'ordinary' cars"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Watson" <wwatson@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <L-FORWARDLOOK@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: [FWDLK] fake Adventurer?! !


Ed,

That is a pretty poor restoration if it is an Adventurer! The nameplate
on
the rear fenders is "Fireflite".  If it was an Adventurer, it should say
"Adventurer" and is missing the Forward Look logo on the rear fenders.
Also, if it was an Adventurer, there should be five trim strips on the top
of the trunk lid. Cannot make out the namplate on the front fender - it
looks like Adventurer. But, if was an Adventurer, there should be
nothing
there.  The Firedome and Fireflite hardtops had "Sportsman" nameplates at
that location, though.

As for the interior, the seats are done in the style of the Firedome,
never
mind the Fireflite or Adventurer.  The pictures do not show enough of the
front door panels to determine what series they are from. I am unable to
find a photo of an interior shot of the rear panels of an Adventurer to
compare to this one. The rear interior panels are incorrect for either a
Firedome or Fireflite hardtop.

Finally, if it is a 1957 Adventurer, it should be a 345-cid hemi, not a
341-cid. Would like to hear his reply, if you get one.

Bill
Vancouver, BC


There's a 1957 "Adventurer" for sale on Collector Car Online.  I have
written the seller. It appears to be all wrong, and I believe the car
is
a
Fireflite with a doctored-up engine compartment.  Just warning all of
you
who may be searching for things....

If I get a reply from the seller, I will let you know.

Here's the car:
<http://www.collectorcartraderonline.com/addetail.html?6237314>

Ed
1957 DeSoto Firedome





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.