A 94 would fit, but it is a dual contact bulb (you'd have to change the
socket) and it would be much too bright - it is 15 CP. The center of light
intensity is also too low. The 93 is also 15 CP, that's why it looked too
bright.
Dick Benjamin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve B." <imprl59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: IML: bulbs for '68 taillights
>The closest substitute, according to the man at Wagner, is the 93. However,
I bought a 93 and tried >it, and it's too bright. Dick B. suggested a 67 or
an 89-- and the 67 is what is listed in the FSM as
How about a 94 bulb. I found one reference that said they were the same.
Also if you can't find the proper bulb you could replace the sockets and use
1157 bulbs then only wire the lower brightness filament to come on.
Steve B.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network