----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 6:47
AM
Subject: Re: IML: 62 tail lights
Haven't gotten into my 62's taillights yet but
EVERY other car I've messed with had connectors on the wires going to the
taillights so no splicing was necessary. This includes 61 Imps so it's a
pretty sure bet the 62 has connectors also. Of course, Lowel may have
just snipped them off when he removed them from the parts car in which case
you can install new ones. I would NOT recommend hard wiring into
the main harness. Spade lug connectors are cheap and available at any
parts store in both solder on and crimp on style. You can get a blister
pack of male/female connectors for a couple bucks.
KerryP
Patch panels fabricated
Pinkertonk@xxxxxxxxx
dte.net/57imperial
Imperials
-- 50 Limo, 57 roadster, 61's, 62, 68 Convert, 73, a 66 300 and a bunch of
lesser marques
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:21
AM
Subject: IML: 62 tail lights
All you boys and girls with
62's
I have a bad tail light. While checking
to see what kind of bulb I would need to replace I found out that some time
in the past some one had glued the lens in. They did a darn good job because
it wasn't noticeable at all. When I put it back together the lens no longer
sits right. Kinda crooked.
I have already sent away for and
received a set of complete taillights from Lowell Howe (A GREAT
guy).
Question 1: Would it be easier to
replace insides or the whole taillight? I would rather keep mine
because they look slightly better than the ones I bought.
Question
2: Would it involve wire cutting and splicing to replace the innards?
ANY comments and suggestions are always
welcome.
Buck Rind and Das Boot
rind@xxxxxxxxxxxx