Re: 1967 Interior Lights (was: IML: Electrical questions...)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1967 Interior Lights (was: IML: Electrical questions...)



Your car is very early, Clay, so it isn't a surprise.  They must have gotten
complaints from folks trying to figure out the 8 similar switches in the
dark, while driving down the road!

This was an expensive mod, as they had to modify the harness to include the
dash illumination circuit in the door wiring.  Even the cheapest modern cars
(and trucks!) have illumination on these switches, but in 1967, this must
have been a real whiz-bang feature!

Dick Benjamin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clay Smith" <clay-deb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: 1967 Interior Lights (was: IML: Electrical questions...)


> My 67 Coupe does NOT have this mystical  cylindrical lighting device.
>   As a proud  67 Imperial owner,and new list member some five plus years
> ago, this door light was  one of the first things I remember reading
about.
>  When I couldn't find the light under the door handle (or hole for a
> light )on my Imperial  I chalked it up as some sort of hazing ritual for
> rookie 67 owners :)
>                                       Clay Smith
>                                        67 Crown Coupe
>                                        60 Custom
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Miller" <kdmiller@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:12 AM
> Subject: 1967 Interior Lights (was: IML: Electrical questions...)
>
>
>
> >
> > This brings up another curious '67 anomaly.  This "little cylindrical
> thing" (as Chris called it - a perfect description!) seems to be an
illusive
> installation on 67s.  I have seen a number of 67 parts cars and have found
> that some have the lamp installed, some don't.  In my particular car, the
> wiring harness was present but the lamp was not (I added one from another
> 67).
> >
> > I haven't found the serial number or option state that predicts whether
> > or not a car will have one.  Sounds like another quest for Dick Benjamin
> > (he did the now somewhat famous research on the changeover to ATC in
> 1967)!
> >
> > A question for 67 owners - do you have one on your 67?
> >
> > Ken Miller
> > 61 and 67 Converts
> >
> >
> >
> >


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.