maligning the Holley
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

maligning the Holley



At 02:10 PM 8/8/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Anyway, when I bought my '67, it had a 4160 Holley on
>it.  I replaced it with a Carter from Summit, but was
>unimpressed.  Performance was not as good, gas mileage
>remained unchanged, and I had to run a wire to operate
>the now-electric choke.

Mike, may be that carter was not fully tuned.  Were the throttles fully 
opening?  Did you try bigger jets for richer mixture at WOT?  (that would 
not help fuel economy though).  Or, may be it was too rich.  Did you ever 
have black smoke with the Carter?  That Holley may start leaking again.  If 
not, disregard the above!  Also, the electric choke may be better overall, 
since you can turn it off a lot sooner than the spring will allow you.  You 
can keep your oil cleaner at the expense of driveability when cold.  If you 
don't drive short trips, this is no big deal.


>The only remaining problem was the fuel vaporization
>problem mentioned before.  The TQ (thermoquad) solves
>this issue by virtue of its phenolic resin base, which
>insulates the carburator from the intake manifold.  My
>solution was to install 3 metal plates sandwiched
>between 4 carburator gaskets, thus creating a
>miniature radiator under the carb.

Don't think these metal plates are doing you any good.  These are not 
insulating!  Then again, they are not doing much harm either.  If you have 
space limitations due to hood interference, the insulation may be more 
effective if you replace the 3 metal plates with 3 more gaskets!
D^2




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.