I like your idea. I wonder if there are enough people in the IML interested in this to do it? Maybe we could do it state by state. I would think there was a way to find out how many vehicles of a particular make are registered in that state, and then get a breakdown by year. I will contact the folks in Florida and see what they say. I recall seeing a chart in Automotive News that purports to show how many of each year are still left on the road, and it was interesting. I don't think this was blind "guesswork" as much as a rough estimate based on some kind of model they had come up with . . . certainly not %100 accurate, but giving a good idea. Jim Gathmann wrote: > It's especially sad... think of all the car models > that once were, which are now no longer in > existance... > > There are groups within certain collectible car groups > which track down certain model... two examples I know > of: > > Buick Grand Nationals... there is/was a group which > tracked down every one ever produced by vin# and this > group can tell you which ones are still out there, > crashed, recycled, etc. > > Saab Monte Carlo, similar, only Saab's records weren't > as good and thus no one knows really how many are > left. > > Makes me wonder (and yes I'm not getting off topic > here!).... it would be truely interesting if a group > got started to track down differnt Imperial years to > see what's left, and what isn't- kind of like the > Buick Grand National group- only maybe not as extreme > (i.e. no one would need to know when the cars > crashed.. but rather the fact that X many have > crashed, Y many are still on the road, etc.). > > It would be quite interesting to see which ones are > the hardest to find. Wouldn't surprise me if the 90's > Imperial (AC Body) is as rare (or more so) then the > '83... > > Sorry if I went a little OT, but I needed some way of > explaining what was in my head... > --- Mark McDonald <tomswift@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jim, > > > > Thanks for that info. Kind of sad, to me, to think > > that %90 of the 68s > > are gone. > > > > I do think while those statistics may be true in > > general, some cars are > > exceptions. For instance, convertibles, and/or the > > first and last model > > of anything. I think people tend to preserve rarer > > bodystyles, or if > > they think the car will be more valuable later on. > > The reason I say > > this is, there seem to be an awful lot of '68 > > convertibles out there. > > > > Jim Gathmann wrote: > > > > > Actually, the '71 car would be about as rare (if > > not > > > more rare) due to the rate in which cars are > > > destroyed. > > > > > > Once I had stats on the % of cars which survive > > after > > > production. It basically came down to a small > > majority > > > of cars of a specific model (+/-65%) will be > > destroyed > > > within the first decade after production. > > > > > > By two decades, that number is up to +/- 80% > > destroyed > > > since production date (also- destroyed referes to > > > being crashed, sent to a junk yard, recycled, > > etc.). > > > > > > By three or more decades, about 90% of the cars > > made > > > since production date are gone. Fogret if those > > > numbers are right (going by memory- had it all > > nicely > > > done up on a poster once). > > > > > > So if you really think about it, your '83 is far > > more > > > common then the 1987 Reliant KPL21 sedan (2 door), > > as > > > only 200 of those were made originally! (as seen @ > > > www.allpar.com). > > > > > >