Off line response, was: 413 vs 440!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Off line response, was: 413 vs 440!



Mike, the answer is no (think I said this before).  However, that's one of 
the reasons I like reading old road tests (especially the more professional 
CarLife tests, like the ones I sent you a few months back).  Not only you 
get their driving impressions and seat of the pants feeling (from people 
used to driving cars of the era) but also performance measurements.  These 
measurements can be more meaningful than seat of the pants feel that one 
might have by driving somebody else's car.  Of course, these are not always 
perfect.  Back then, it took a while for engines to break in, and there is 
always a chance the comparisons were not fair.

As a side note, the in the 67 test, they reported they could get the tires 
loose with ease (9.15x15 tires).  With the 413 cars, the road testers often 
say they could not do that (8.20x15).
D^2

At 12:01 PM 7/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>We're getting a little theoretical again.....what I'd like to know is,
>Square D, have you ever driven a 413-powered car?  If not, what are we
>arguing about?
>
>Mike Trettin
>1956 Imperial Sedan, Turquoise





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.