RE: IML: sequential mechanism?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: IML: sequential mechanism?



Æyn,

If you're unable to locate working parts to restore the sequential signal
operation, you can always upgrade to the electronic version.  I've heard
good things about the STS-1 module sold by www.webelectricproducts.com

I've been thinking of adding this feature to both my 67 and 68.  I just
haven't gotten around to ordering the modules yet.

Ken
67 Crown 4 Dr Ht
68 LeBaron 4 Dr Ht


-----Original Message-----
From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of aeyn
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 4:42 PM
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IML: sequential mechanism?

Fred (et al),
   You are correct.  The headrests were mandatory on Jan 1, 1969;
however, were optional prior to that date.  To obtain the relays
and Cam motor/Solid state Sequencer for a 1969 Imperial look for
the items from a 1968-1970 Cougar or Thunderbird.  The car before
I bought my 1969 Imperial in 1971 was a new 1970 Cougar.  I
studied the Sequncer system in it and also in the 69 Imperial and
they are identical.  It must have been made by a 3rd party for
each company.

Æyn

--- Frederick Joslin <fljoslin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Aeyn:Yes, it is a 69 Lebaron coupe.The rear turn signal control
> parts
> were removed by a previous owner. I was not even aware that
> this car had
> sequential rear signals until I read it on the club web site.If
> it makes
> any difference I believe that this is an early car. Assuming
> that the
> front seat is original, it does not have the head rests which I
> believe
> were mandated Jan 1st 1969.
> 
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: aeyn
>   To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   Subject: IML: sequential mechanism?
>   Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> 
>   Fred,
>   I take it the you have a 69. Do you still have the original
>   parts? If so, was it solid state or Cam motor? Also, are the
>   relays still in place?
> 
>   Æyn
>   Had 69 from 1971-1980
> 
>   --- Frederick Joslin wrote:
> 
>   > Hi Dwain:On my car the heat riser valve was quite loose,
> hench
>   > the
>   > rattling, and having the counterweight rotated clockwise
>   > against the stop
>   > was the cold engine off position. The sequential mechanism
> has
>   > been
>   > entirely removed from my car. It is on my list of things to
> do,
>   > but
>   > pretty far down.
>   >
>   > ----- Original Message -----
>   > From: Kinkodw@xxxxxxx
>   > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   > Subject: Re: IML: Heat riser rotation?
>   > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:32:42 EDT
>   >
>   > Fred, Thanks for the quick reply. I have the counterweight
>   > rotated all
>   > the way clockwise against the stop looking at it from the
> top.
>   > I guess
>   > this means the valve is then closed and directing exhaust
> thru
>   > the intake
>   > manifold. Luckily I just did this "correction" as some of
> the
>   > letters
>   > stated that the counterweight needs be rotated clockwise
> toward
>   > the front
>   > of the vehicle. Luckily I've only had it out once since
>   > rotating it,
>   > maybe 40 miles worth. I'll rotate it towards the rear of
> the
>   > vehicle in
>   > the morning. hopefully this will lock the valve open
> bypassing
>   > the intake
>   > manifold. Thanks. By the way, do your sequential turn
> signals
>   > function
>   > correctly? I'm having a bear of a time with mine.Only two
> of
>   > the three
>   > taillights sequence on either side when activated and the
>   > emergency
>   > flashers just stopped working.. Thanks again, Dwain'69
>   > Lebaron..
>   >
>   >
>   >
>  
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   >
>   > Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > Fred Joslin
>   >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>
____________________________________________________________________________
________
>   Looking for a deal? Find great prices on
>   flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.
>   http://farechase.yahoo.com/
> 
>   ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
> -----------------
>   This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List.
> Please
>   reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will
> be
>   shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for
> the
>   Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
>   To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> 
> 
> 
> Fred Joslin
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________
________Ready for the edge of your seat? 
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. 
http://tv.yahoo.com/

-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm


-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.