I should have stated my
radio is an AM/FM unit and I'm pretty sure it has the touch button above the
dial. I must have a '66 radio, I guess. Someone could have changed
it over the years (or in '66 when they became available). Heck, I'm just
glad I have AM/FM. Down here in lower Alabama, the AM stations
are mostly talk radio or gospel music. There isn't much else
to choose from.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:32
AM
Subject: Re: IML: '65 & '66
Radio
This is really
interesting. My car was built very early in the '65 production year
(Sept. 8, 1964) so it would not have been a situation where it was late in the
production year and the '66 radio was installed in it at the factory.
Strange that my car would have the floor switch. Could that have been
installed (the floor switch only) later and connected to the existing radio or
would the radio have to be swapped out for a '66 model? For whatever
reason(s), my car ended up with the floor switch and the signal seeking
radio. Like other parts, is there a code stamped somewhere on the
radio that would indicate its build date and if it is a '66 model radio
rather than a '65?
Thanks!
Greg
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 12:54
AM
Subject: Re: IML: '65 & '66
Radio
In 65 the AM radio had a floor switch. The AM/FM did not have a floor
switch-this feature was not available on the AM/FM. Had them both!!
Don Savard
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 8:12
PM
Subject: Re: IML: '65 & '66
Radio
Eric,
Are you sure the '65's did not have the floor
switch? The radio in my '65 has the floor mounted search tune
and it was working fine when my car went off to the restoration
shop. Of course, the radio in my car may not be original but
certainly did appear to have not ever been changed when I took the
dash pad off.
Greg McDonnell '65 Crown convertible
-----
Original Message ----- From: "Forwarded Message, See Email In Text"
<gearhead@xxxxxxxxxxx> To:
<mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent:
Sunday, March 20, 2005 9:54 PM Subject: Re: IML: '65 & '66
Radio
> Per the '66 brochure: "The FM/AM and AM radios
include : touch-tuning with > a finger bar or floor switch, in
addition to pushbuttons, rear seat > speaker with rheostat volume
control and power antenna - at no additional >
cost." > > This was a new radio over the '64 and '65 FM/AM
radios which did not have > search tune nor the foot switch. Stereo
came another year or two later as > a stand alone item apart from
the radio. > > Eric > Portland, Oregon > >
----- Original Message ----- > From: <RandalPark@xxxxxxx> > To:
<mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 7:35 PM > Subject: Re: IML: '65 &
'66 Radio > > >>I stand corrected, but I still think
that there was something different >>between the two. Does your
AM/FM have the "Local/Dist Wonder Bar" over the >>radio dial? If
it doesn't, that is the difference that I was thinking of. >>It
has been so many years ago. >> >>
Paul >> >> In an email dated Mon, 21 3 2005 2:36:15 am
GMT, "Neal Herman" >> <chrycordoba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes: >> >>>My '66 has AM/FM with reverb and the
foot control search tune. >>> >>>Neal
Herman >>>1959 Imperial >>>1966
Imperial >>>et
al. >>> >>> >>>> [Original
Message] >>>> From: <RandalPark@xxxxxxx> >>>>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>
Date: 3/20/2005 6:31:15 PM >>>> Subject: Re: IML: '65 &
'66 Radio >>>> >>>> As I recall, the '65 and
'66 radio option was either an AM radio with >>>search tune
and foot switch, or an AM/FM radio without search tune
and >>>floor switch. Reverb was available for
both. >>>> >>>>
Paul >>>> >>>> In an email dated Sun, 20 3
2005 5:15:58 pm GMT, "Don Savard" >>><res03r3f@xxxxxxxxxxx>
writes: >>>> >>>>
>Chris, >>>> > If you have an AM/FM radio they can be
reconditioned/rebuilt. A local >>>guy does it here for about
$350.00. >>>> > Don >>>> > -----
Original Message ----- >>>> > From: Chris "Creesto"
Lynch<mailto:creesto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>
> To: >>>> > mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 8:37 AM >>>> >
Subject: Re: IML: Bill Ulman's Excellent Adventure >>>>
> >>>> > >>>> > A couple of
questions for Bill and Kenyon. >>>>
> >>>> > Bill: Nice. Didn't grab an extra parts for
the rest of us '66 owners? >>>You >>>> > can
stop your gloating ennnnnytime, Bill. >>>>
> >>>> > BTW, you didn't mention what sort of vehicle
Ruth owned that you were >>>> >
coveting. >>>> > >>>> > But the big
question is this: Kenyon, have you posted anything on
the >>>site >>>> > about this wired-on wheel
cover safety feature and with a pic of the >>>tool
in >>>> > question? Many of us '66 owners would benefit
I'm sure, but I don't >>>recall >>>> >
hearing about this before. >>>> > >>>>
> Bill, you sounded very wound up from your road trip. Again, I
bemoan >>>the >>>> > fact that I live in the
dead center of the Midwest and cannot travel >>>to
the >>>> > West Coast, aka Xanadu for
Imperials. >>>> > >>>> > And I'm still
looking for a DECENT foot switch-activated Am/FM radio >>>for
my >>>> > '66 Imperial Crown Coupe. >>>>
> >>>> > Cheers! >>>>
> >>>> > creesto >>>>
> >>>> > > From: "Wm. R.
Ulman" >>><twolaneblacktop@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:twolaneblacktop@xxxxxxxxxxx>> >>>>
> > Subject: IML: Kenyon Wills visit, and the Imperial parts
Nirvana >>>experience >>>> > > Date: Sun,
20 Mar 2005 02:12:58 -0800 >>>> > >
Reply-To: >>>mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. >>>>
> > >>>> > > I was down in San Francisco last
week visiting my Mom, and seeing = >>>> > > friends.
I >>>> > > contacted Kenyon to see if we could get
together to meet, and talk >>>> > >
Imperials. >>>> > >>>> > > When we
got to "Doc's" I was amazed at the rows, upon rows
of >>>engines, >>>> > > scattered varied
parts, but most of all, the "Texas Chain Saw >>>Massacre"
= >>>> > > barn >>>> > > full
cobwebs, spiders, and several of any one part anyone could
>>>> > > ever >>>= >>>>
> > need >>>> > > for an Imperial! I found 3
'66 hubcaps within the virtual
mountain >>>of >>>> > > '66-'69 style
caps, and Kenyon threw in 3 extra earlier year caps >>>that
= >>>> > > had >>>> > >
perfectly good retaining rings on them so I might figure out a way
>>>> > > to >>>> > > replace
the destroyed ones on what are otherwise
perfectly >>>presentable = >>>> > >
caps >>>> > > that had flown off Doris at earlier
dates, and been run over. The >>>caps = >>>>
> > are >>>> > > all fine, but the retaining
rings were mangled beyond any hope. >>> Now,
= >>>> > > how to >>>> > >
replace the retaining rings on the '66 caps I did salvage from
the >>>side = >>>> > >
of >>>> > > the road? It appears the backings are,
for lack of better >>>description, >>>> >
> "Crimped" onto the hubcap, at least around the outer
perimeter. >>> That = >>>> > >
would >>>> > > need to be folded back, ring replaced,
and re-crimped to be >>>successful. >>>> >
> Kenyon came up with a "slice, and weld" solution that could very
= >>>> > > possibly >>>> > >
work, but would be expensive, I'm sure. Although, with the
scarcity >>>of >>>> > > these caps these
days, it may just be worth it to have a reserve >>>stash
= >>>> > > of >>>> > > the 20
lb. projectile killer hubcaps on hand. Is that Honda in
the >>>next >>>> > > lane with the big
Kazoo "Muffler" getting on your nerves? Well, >>>with
= >>>> > > just >>>> > > the
proper pothole, you can dislodge a '66 hubcap smack into
the >>>Honda, = >>>> > >
and >>>> > > totaling it Pull over, retrieve said
hubcap from the flaming >>>wreckage, = >>>>
> > and >>>> > > scamper away. If anyone sees
you, they will surely report your car >>>as
= >>>> > > an >>>> > > Impala,
and you will never get caught. =20 >>>> > >
=20 >>>> > > Kenyon also showed me a way to wire the
caps on so as they would >>>> > >
not >>>be = >>>> > >
able >>>> > > to fly off. Very ingenious, and
involves a nifty tool Kenyon had in >>>his >>>>
> > garage, I forget what he called it, but it was a twisting
= >>>> > > wrench/grip/wire >>>> >
> spinner type of deal some guy in Pomona (where the proverbial
Pimp >>>in my >>>> > > previous posts is
from) designed while drunk one night, and made >>>> >
> his >>>= >>>> > >
million >>>> > > on patenting, and marketing.
=20 >>>> > > =20 >>>> > > The
only casualty was a Black Widow spider who had taken
up >>>residence in = >>>> > >
one >>>> > > of the '66 caps, and as I was holding
it, she was moving quickly to >>>let = >>>>
> > me >>>> > > know her position on my
dislodgement of her home. A quick shake of >>>the
= >>>> > > arm, >>>> > > while
releasing the said hubcap as quickly as humanly possible
from >>>my = >>>> > >
hand >>>> > > was all that needed to dislodge her
from her home, the cap, and >>>> > >
Liz, >>>> > > Kenyon's girlfriends quick stomp of her
foot, sent the BW to "The = >>>> > >
promised >>>> > > land". >>>> >
> =20 >>>> > > Upon my arrival back at my Mom's
apt., I struck a deal with her. >>> Let me >>>>
> > clean the caps up in her tub, and I would scour the whole
thing, >>>wall = >>>> > >
tiles >>>> > > and all. After assuring her the
dislodged buildup of years worth of >>>= >>>>
> > dirt, >>>> > > and weed debris (from the
caps, not my Mom's tub) would in fact
NOT >>>= >>>> > >
clog >>>> > > up, and utter useless, the San
Francisco Municipal Sewer System, I >>>was >>>>
> > permitted to proceed. My Mom was so happy with her
shower/tub >>>cleaning, = >>>> > >
and >>>> > > that the S.F. sewer system was well
equipped to accommodate the >>>sheer = >>>>
> > volume >>>> > > of dirt it was subjected to
in such a short period of time, she >>>shipped
= >>>> > > the >>>> > > 6 caps
to me gratis. >>>> > > =20 >>>> >
> Kenyon was a swell host, a lot of fun to talk to, and I got to
see >>>up = >>>> > >
close >>>> > > and personal the differences in the
lines between a '70 Imperial, >>>and a = >>>>
> > '73. >>>> > > Both fine cars in style, but
I will go with the '70 as my personal >>>> > >
= >>>> > > choice. >>>> > >
Although with the bumper extensions on the '73, making it
the >>>largest = >>>> > >
Post >>>> > > WWII production car is an appealing
thought, and they are quite = >>>> > >
striking. >>>> > > At least the 4dr is. More so than
the coupe, which I prefer the >>>'69-'71 >>>>
> > version of with it's rounded rear quarter windows, rather then
the >>>> > > = >>>> > >
'72-'73 >>>> > > coupes squared quarter window. That
is merely a personal >>>preference, as = >>>>
> > all >>>> > > Imperials are beautiful in
their own rights. >>>> > > =20 >>>>
> > In summary, if you want a part for your car, and would care to
meet >>>a = >>>> > >
very >>>> > > nice fellow Imperialist who is just
genuinely trying to help all >>>these >>>> >
> parts, and supplies get good homes before they are all sent
en-mass >>>to = >>>> > >
the >>>> > > county dump, contact Kenyon, and go for
a drive to Hal David/Burt >>>> > > Bacharach/Dionne
Warwick land. Hum the tune while traveling. >>>> > >
=20 >>>> > > Bill Ulman >>>> > >
Seattle, WA =20 >>>> > > '66 Crown Convertible Coupe
- Doris Day >>>> > > WA State vanity plates:
FIT4AQN >>>> > >>>>
> >>>> > >>>> >
----------------- >>> http://www.imperialclub.com<http://www.imperialclub.com/> >>>
----------------- >>>> > This message was sent to you by
the Imperial Mailing List. Please >>>> > reply
to >>>mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
and >>>your response will be >>>> > shared
with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for
the >>>> > Administrators should be sent
to >>>webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go
to >>>http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm<http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe. >>>htm> >>>>
> >>>> > >>>>
> >>>> >>>> >>>>
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
----------------- >>>> This message was sent to you by the
Imperial Mailing List. Please >>>> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and your response will be >>>> shared with everyone.
Private messages (and attachments) for the >>>>
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-----------------
http://www.imperialclub.com
----------------- >>>This message was sent to you by the
Imperial Mailing List. Please >>>reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and your response will be >>>shared with everyone. Private
messages (and attachments) for the >>>Administrators should be
sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>To
UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm >>> >>> >> >> >>
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
----------------- >> This message was sent to you by the Imperial
Mailing List. Please >> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and your response will be >> shared with everyone. Private
messages (and attachments) for the >> Administrators should be
sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > > > >
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
----------------- > This message was sent to you by the Imperial
Mailing List. Please reply to > mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and your response will be shared with > everyone. Private messages
(and attachments) for the > Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm >
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing
List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and
attachments) for the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To
UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
|