Re: IML: Duel Snorkel
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: Duel Snorkel
- From: dardal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:00:13 -0600
There will be no fuel economy advantage. You should get a slightly improved
performance at higher rpm. The improvement depends on the engine and rpm. The
higher the demands of engine for air (ie, higher rpm, larger displacement,
bigger cam, etc) the biggest the improvement. The downside is a bit more noise
at WOT. However, the sound of the intake is "improved" (relative term) at WOT
even though the desibell level is higher. In fact, some of the "improvement"
in performance comes from the sound difference (phsychological improvement). I
say that because when I opened s second hole on my LeBaron's air cleaner, I
thought I got better torque even at low rpm, which makes no sense. However,
based on some basic calculations I had done from flow data I had for both
single and dual snorkel, I had estimated an improvement of about 3% at 3000 rpm
WOT for a 440.
The 413's have smaller air consumption, but I think the stock air cleaners were
even smaller than the stock 440.
D^2, 2x68
Quoting Blomberg <blomberg@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Is there any advantage/improvement on engine/fuel performance by replacing
> the single air intake with a duel on a 413.
>
> Larry
> 1960 LeBaron Sedan
> http://www.imperialclub.com/Yr/1960/Blomberg/Page01.htm
>
>
>
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network