Plug Number 63 413
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Plug Number 63 413



I haven't bought any 75's myself. I do have a set or two of old plugs with 
obselete numbers, and they are resistor plugs. Now we know what the difference 
is between the 75's and the 85's.

Paul

In a message dated 2/27/2004 11:09:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
jsadowski@xxxxxxx writes:

> Paul, I have since seen it posted that Autolite #75 is a non-resistor plug & 
>#85 is a resistor plug in the same heat range. I always buy the resistor 
>plugs, so this never occurred to me.
> John
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: RandalPark@xxxxxxx 
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 8:19 PM
> Subject: Re: IML: FW: Plug Number 63 413
> 
> 
> I had an old set of Autolites that were an obsolete number. Yesterday another 
>IML'er asked the number for the 413, but I wanted to provide a current number, 
>so I called my parts supplier and he gave me the "75" for the '59-'65 413. 
>Interestingly in Champion, there were two numbers that would fit, one was a 
>"high performance" plug. I gave the IML'er all of the numbers and recommended 
>that he check a tune up parts Web site to verify the numbers. I haven't heard 
>that the "75" wasn't the right one for that car.. I suspect that possibly a 
>"75" is the standard plug, and that the "85" may be a hotter plug. It is also 
>possible that the parts guy was completely wrong. 
> 
> Back in the "old days" if an engine was a little worn, but ran good, we would 
>run a "hotter plug" to postpone the inevitable oil fowling. I am now thinking 
>that I may have bought "85"s for a '65 Chrysler 300 Coupe that I used to have.
> 
> Paul
> 
> In a message dated 2/26/2004 9:52:08 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
>jsadowski@xxxxxxx writes:
> 
> > Paul, Are you sure Autolite # 75's will work in a 413 -440? I use # 85's in 
>my cars.
> > John
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: RandalPark@xxxxxxx 
> > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: IML: FW: Plug Number 63 413
> > 
> > 
> > I just looked up the plug numbers yesterday. In Autolite it is  "75". I 
>have the Champion number too, RJ12YC or RJ14YC. 
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > In a message dated 2/26/2004 5:31:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
>bshea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I connected the ballast almost wants to start but will not fire.What is 
>the
> > > plug # for a 413?If I get it started,does  anyone want this motor?
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Brian Shea [mailto:bshea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 8:03 AM
> > > To: Mailing-List
> > > Subject: starting 63 413
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I turned the motor over by hand, put a new battery in it,and it turns 
>over a
> > > little slow and wont fire.I noticed 2 wires that were chewed on the fire
> > > wall.They look like they were connected to
> > > two white resistor looking things.Are these ballast resistors,and would 
>thi
> > > have an effect on the spark.The points are set perfectly.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> > > This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
> > > reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
> > > shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> > > Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to 
> > > http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> > 
> > 


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.