Re: IML: odd LeBaron/branding question

[Christopher H <imperial67@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It's called mining your own heritage for commercial gain. Over the years Chrysler has been good at recycling badges and car names. When the LeBaron debuted, both the name and the former Imperial badge were "available."

Now what possessed them to revive the tarnished "Aspen" name for the new Chrysler version of the Dodge Durango escapes me, but sometimes it's easier to revive an old trademark than come up with and register an original one. Witness the five different uses of the Duster name (including "Trail Duster," which was the Plymouth version of the semirecycled "Ramcharger") over the years and, while I'm at it, the five uses of Charger (including the aformentioned SUV and the 225 Slant Six in the early 1960s), as well as numerous others (Dart, Lancer, St Regis).

That said, compact LeBarons (though we'd consider them midsize or even large cars today) were not Imperials (though they are handsome cars and were very successful). To distinguish the '90 Imperial from the recent LeBarons, they made the eagle more elaborate and added the gold wreath, which to me made it look like a Cadillac logo...

Oh, well.
Chris in LA


-----Original Message-----
>From: Nat Hall <nathall@xxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jun 5, 2006 10:33 PM
>To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: IML: odd LeBaron/branding question
>
>This one has bugged me for a long time, but I've got to ask.
>
>The 1977-1981 LeBarons retain the Imperial "wings" badge on the taillights,
>cornering lights, some even have the Imperial hood ornament. Before I
>became more knowledgable on Imperials, I actually always thought these
>*were* Imperials.  (When the LeBaron became a K-car in 1982 or 1983 this
>disappeared.)
>
>So what's the explanation for this? I thought the wings badge was an
>exclusive indication of an Imperial. Are these supposed to be Imperials in
>essence (or something) despite the fact the Imperial line had been
>discontinued during this time? I've never seen this mentioned or even
>acknowledged anywhere in Imperial texts or on our website.
>
>Maybe I just missed something? :)
>
>
>-------------------
>Nat Hall
>1982 Imperial Coupe
>1987 Chrysler New Yorker
>http://newyorker.digital-forever.com
>-------------------
>
>
>
>
>-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
>This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
>reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
>shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
>Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>



-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm