Re: IML: '65 to '73 Platform

[RandalPark@xxxxxxx]

It is not true that Imperials from '65 to '73 shared the same basic platform. 1965 and 1966 Imperials were still based on their old design. The rest of the full sized Chrysler line adopted the new platform in 1965, but the Imperial didn't share it until 1967.

Paul W.

In an email dated 21/8/2005 10:47:52 pm GMT Daylight time, Mark McDonald <tomswift@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>While it is true that the Imperials from '65 to '73 shared the same 
>basic platform or underpinnings, that shouldn't be construed as further 
>evidence that they were all part of the same design era or trend. ?
>Stylists can rework a basic platform to the point that you can't even 
>recognize that two cars share the same platform-- witness today's Ford 
>Five Hundred and the Volvo S80.
>
>I think it's a tribute to Chrysler designers that they were able to 
>make Imperials from these years look so different. ?And though it's a 
>funny image, I don't think the fuselage cars look like a hippo on 
>roller skates! ?:)
>
>Mark
>
>On Saturday, August 20, 2005, at 02:31 PM, Bill Watson wrote:
>
>>
>> Very true. ?The platform and cowl of the 1969-73 fuselage models dated 
>> back
>> to 1965. ? Those are the expensive parts to tool due to the size of the
>> pieces involved, and they are not seen by the car buyer. ? The use of 
>> the
>> 1965-68 platform for the fuselage models in 1969 resulted in more than 
>> a few
>> comments that the new body styles looked a little heavy and plump due 
>> to the
>> narrow rear wheel track/tread. ?This was especially true on the Polara 
>> and
>> Monaco and less so on the Fury. ?The Chrysler and Imperial did not 
>> have this
>> problem.
>>
>> The Imperial's front track was 62.4" from 1967 through 1973 while the 
>> rear
>> was increased from 61.1" in 1967-1969 to 62.0" for 1970.
>>
>> The Polara, on the other hand, had a rear track of ?60.7" in 1967-69 
>> which
>> was increased to 63.4" in 1970. ?Made for a much more balanced look 
>> and less
>> like a hippo on roller skates.
>>
>> Bill
>> Vancouver, BC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Brad Hogg" <luxoliner@xxxxxxx>
>> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 11:04 AM
>> Subject: Re: Re: IML: Fuselage Era cars - 69-71 as only Fuselages a 
>> tough
>> sell
>>
>>
>>> I don't know how long it lasted (I suspect until 1973) but the 1969
>>> "redesigned" Chrysler was the same chassis design as the 67/68. ?Maybe
>> hard
>>> to believe but true.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------- ?http://www.imperialclub.com ?-----------------
>> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
>> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
>> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
>> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>>
>
>
>
>----------------- ?http://www.imperialclub.com ?-----------------
>This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
>reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
>shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
>Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>


-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm