RE: IML: classic car safety

["javier" <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My 1965 300 (non-letter) Convertible had front and rear seatbelts.  Seat
belts were not listed on the build sheet as an option.

Javier Reynaldos
Former owner of 
1966 Shriner's convertible "Bubbles"
1965 300 convertible
Currently in the market for a 1968 Convertible

-----Original Message-----
From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DR CHALLENGER
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:34 PM
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IML: classic car safety

then nobody including insurance should have to pay for injuries you
receive 
when not wearing them.

>From: "Buck Rind" <rind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>  I do not believe in the seat belt law. It should be left up to the
>individual not mandated by the government. My 1962 Imperial did not
come 
>equipped with belts and I won't put them in.
>
>




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm