Re: IML: Was About Tom McCahill, and his judgement of the car in '67/ now demo guys

["M Turner" <tminjesu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am I being a bit picky by suggesting this McCahill thread has run about 
thread-bare?
Vince in Boston

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "imperialman" <imperialman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:17 PM
Subject: IML: Was About Tom McCahill, and his judgement of the car in '67/ 
now demo guys


> Actually I think "our friends " keep a close eye on our IML want ads and 
> probably the mailing list itself looking for deals.
> A recent poll on one of our "friends" websites had the 67-68's voted 
> tougher than the  64-66 Imperials.
>
> Clay Smith
> 67  Crown Coupe
> 60 Custom
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <dardal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 3:35 PM
> Subject: Re: IML: About Tom McCahill, and his judgement of the car in '67
>
>
> > Let's hope that this will never reach the ears of our "friends"!
> >
> > D^2
> >
> > Quoting Hugh & Therese <hugtrees@xxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > > Dimitrios,
> > >
> > > Are you suggesting that our friends in the demolition derby game should
> > > start snapping up 67 & 68 Imperials?  And I thought you just liked 
> > > racing
> > > them on the roads!
> > >
> > > Hugh
> > > TFIC
> > > (Tongue firmly in cheek)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Another unique feature of the 67-68's is the amazing strength of the
> > > > front structure.  Even though some folks in the demolition community 
> > > > seem
> > > > to
> > > > prefer the earlier Imperials, the front end structure of the 67-68s is 
> > > > far
> > >
> > > > more
> > > > reinforced, which means better safety and vehicle survivability in a 
> > > > rough
> > > > crush.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> > > This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> > > reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> > > shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> > > Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> > This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> > reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> > shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> > Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>
>
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to 
> mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with 
> everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm