Re: Reason for the question on 1963 New Yorker engines
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reason for the question on 1963 New Yorker engines




It may need that 6-71 blower just to get moving.  ;)

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Brian Seeley" <im4amc_scouts2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 12:57 PM
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Reason for the question on 1963 New Yorker engines




Yep, that's the one. Anyone know how many of these things were made?

I'm thinking some Cragar SS rims, maybe a 6-71 blower... :)

Brian

To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
From: jchistia@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Reason for the question on 1963 New Yorker engines
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:12:31 -0500


Go for it!

http://nh.craigslist.org/cto/2234864075.html



--------------------------------------------------
From: "Brian Seeley" <im4amc_scouts2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:32 AM
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Reason for the question on 1963 New Yorker engines

>
>
>
> Thanks for the info. The reason I asked is I found someone selling what > I > think is a pretty unusual car. It's a 1963 Chrysler New Yorker LIMO! > It's > the airport-type limo with 3 doors on each side. From the pics the > seller > posted, it looks pretty solid. I wanted to make sure it would have a > big
> block, not so it could be ripped out, but because a limo powered by
> anything other than a big block would probably not have much umph. I'd
> really like to take a look at the car. It's been for sale for a while > and
> is now VERY reasonably priced. I think it would make a fun cruiser. My
> only issue is, I don't know if I could fit it in my driveway! > Seriously! I > wouldn't be able to turn it around in my driveway and backing down my > hill > onto a major street would get someone killed! Put it this way: when I > had > my car trailer, I had to back it up my driveway so I could pull > straight
> out.
>
> Anyway, I'll keep everyone posted. If I don't get it, I'll post up the
> info so maybe someone else can grab it.
>
> Brian
>
>> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
>> From: spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: Question on 1963 New Yorker engines
>> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:24:35 -0600
>>
>>
>> Yes, the 413 was the usual stock New Yorker engine, the 361 the stock >> one
>> in lesser trim Chryslers like the Newport.
>>
>> A slant 6 Chrysler would be a rare one. Like the slant 6 Challengers. >> :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gary H.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> >From: Roger
>> >
>> >The 413 was the standard engine, but in 63 it seems you could do to a
>> >dealer and if they liked you and  you had the money you could have
>> >probably
>> >even got one with a slant 6 in it,,,,,
>> >
>> >
>> >In a message dated 2/28/2011 9:23:10 P.M. Central Standard Time,
>> >im4amc_scouts  writes:
>> >
>> >Howdy all. Just a pretty simple question. Was the only engine >> >available
>> >in
>> >the 63  Chrysler New Yorker the 413
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
>> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and
>> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
>> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
>> protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune >> the
>> content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>>
>> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>>
>
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will > protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.


--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.





----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.











Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.