Re: Why not Mopar electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II, or III
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why not Mopar electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II, or III?
- From: Herb <zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:57:29 -0500
Yup if not more!! I should have qualified my statement to conversions in
our cars. Just being on the site and all.
Herb
-------Original Message-------
From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx
Date: 8/11/2010 4:52:01 PM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why not Mopar electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II,
or III?
Hmmm,,,,,,,,,,, might mean that there are over 5 times as many people
using the mopar ignition as the pertronix,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
In a message dated 8/11/2010 9:32:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Run into more people having problems with MoPar ignition than I have with
Pertronix!
Herb
1956 Plymouth Belvedere 361
1959 Coronet 326 Poly
1961 Belvedere Custom Suburban 318 Poly
1962 Dodge Dart 225 Slant Six
1963 Fury 2D/HT 6.1L
1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361
1999 Durango SLT 5.9L
2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1L
St. Louis, MO.
http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo42009.html
-------Original Message-------
From: JJ
Date: 8/11/2010 7:08:02 AM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Why not Mopar electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II, or
III?
?
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:02 AM
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Ignitor I, II, or III
>
> I would love to know the answer to that...but all I've been able to do
> when calling Pertronix is sit on hold.
>
> I manually checked out the rest of the parts in the system and all the
> other components area fine. Pertronix is the only part left and of
> course it worked fine the next morning.
>
> --
> Bill M
> 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota SLT
> 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Gary H. <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is there a way to test the Pertronix Ignitor I unit you have before you
>> shell out for a replacement?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gary H.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>>I'm going to go ahead and replace my Pertronix Ignitor I in the
>>>Coronet, as I think that's the source of my recent problem, and I'm
>>>trying to decide to replace it with the same unit, or step it up to
>>>the II or III unit. Anyone have some additional insight they can
>>>share? It looks like the III unit offers Multiple Spark Discharge.
>>>Each unit is about $25 more than the previous model.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Bill M
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www
1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
negotiations as
well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce
the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.
Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www
1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy
?p=TEXFOOTER
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network