Re: Why not Mopar electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II, or III
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why not Mopar electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II, or III?




Yup if not more!!  I should have qualified my statement to conversions in
our cars.  Just being on the site and all.
 
 Herb
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx
Date: 8/11/2010 4:52:01 PM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why not Mopar electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II,
or III?
 
 
Hmmm,,,,,,,,,,, might mean that there are over 5 times as many  people
using the mopar ignition as the pertronix,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 
 
In a message dated 8/11/2010 9:32:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
 
 
 
Run into more people having problems with MoPar ignition  than I have with
Pertronix!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
             
 
Herb
 
 
 
1956 Plymouth Belvedere  361
 
1959 Coronet 326 Poly
 
1961 Belvedere Custom Suburban 318  Poly
 
1962 Dodge Dart 225 Slant Six
 
1963 Fury 2D/HT  6.1L
 
1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361
 
1999 Durango SLT  5.9L
 
2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1L
 
St. Louis,  MO.
 
 
 
http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo42009.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------Original  Message-------
 
 
 
From: JJ
 
Date: 8/11/2010 7:08:02  AM
 
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
 
Subject: Why not Mopar  electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II,  or
III?
 
 
 
?
 
 
 
--------------------------------------------------
 
From:  "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010  8:02 AM
 
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
Subject: Re:  Ignitor I, II, or III
 
 
 
>
 
> I would love to know the  answer to that...but all I've been able to do
 
> when calling  Pertronix is sit on hold.
 
>
 
> I manually checked out the  rest of the parts in the system and all the
 
> other components area  fine. Pertronix is the only part left and of
 
> course it worked fine  the next morning.
 
>
 
> --
 
> Bill M
 
> 65  Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
 
>  73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota SLT
 
> 21 Model T Depot  Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
 
>
 
>
 
> On Tue, Aug  10, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Gary H. <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
 
>>
 
>>
 
>> Is there a way to test  the Pertronix Ignitor I unit you have before you
 
>> shell out for  a replacement?
 
>>
 
>> Thanks,
 
>> Gary  H.
 
>>
 
>> -----Original  Message-----
 
>>>I'm going to go ahead and replace my Pertronix  Ignitor I in the
 
>>>Coronet, as I think that's the source of  my recent problem, and I'm
 
>>>trying to decide to replace it  with the same unit, or step it up to
 
>>>the II or III unit.  Anyone have some additional insight they can
 
>>>share? It  looks like the III unit offers Multiple Spark  Discharge.
 
>>>Each unit is about $25 more than the previous  model.
 
>>>
 
>>>--
 
>>>Bill  M
 
>
 
>
 
> ----
 
> Please address private  mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
 
> directly to that  person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and
 
> negotiations  as well as other personal messages only to the intended
 
> recipient,  not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will
protect
 
>  your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the  content
 
> signal to Mopar topic.   Thanks!
 
>
 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion  Guidelines:
 
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html  and
 
>  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
 
>
 
>
 
 
 
 
 
----
 
Please  address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to  that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and
negotiations
as  well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the  Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce  the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to  Mopar
topic.  Thanks!
 
 
 
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse  Discussion  Guidelines:
 
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and  http://www
1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
 
 
 
 
[Non-text  portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
----
Please address  private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that  person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and
negotiations as
well as  other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
Clubhouse  public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce
the total  volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.
Thanks!
 
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion  Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
 
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic.  Thanks!
 
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www
1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
 
 
 
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy



?p=TEXFOOTER





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.