Re: Why not Mopar electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II, or III?

[JJ <jchistia@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Makes sense

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:11 AM
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why not Mopar electronic conversion instead of Ignitor I, II, 
or III?

> No box to hide, no additional wiring harness to run/hide. The
> conversion from points to the Pertronix is a 15-20 minute job...and
> that included finding the right tools in your messy toolbox!!!
>
> --
> Bill M
> 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota SLT
> 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:07 AM, JJ <jchistia@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > ?
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Bill" <Y1TopBanana73@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:02 AM
> > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: Ignitor I, II, or III
> >
> > > I would love to know the answer to that...but all I've been able to do
> > > when calling Pertronix is sit on hold.
> > >
> > > I manually checked out the rest of the parts in the system and all the
> > > other components area fine. Pertronix is the only part left and of
> > > course it worked fine the next morning.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bill M
> > > 65 Coronet 500 'vert http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo62008.html
> > > 73 Dart Sport, 00 Cherokee Sport, 01 Dakota SLT
> > > 21 Model T Depot Hack, 92 Accord, 06 Mazda 3
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Gary H. <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > Is there a way to test the Pertronix Ignitor I unit you have before you
> > > > shell out for a replacement?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Gary H.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > I'm going to go ahead and replace my Pertronix Ignitor I in the
> > > > > Coronet, as I think that's the source of my recent problem, and I'm
> > > > > trying to decide to replace it with the same unit, or step it up to
> > > > > the II or III unit. Anyone have some additional insight they can
> > > > > share? It looks like the III unit offers Multiple Spark Discharge.
> > > > > Each unit is about $25 more than the previous model.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Bill M
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect 
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content 
> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.