Re: 426 block was (Re: test and tune)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 426 block was (Re: test and tune)
- From: Dodger7998@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:25:46 EDT
Ok,,,,,,,,guess I was under the impression that the street wedges did not
come about until the 65 models, sorry, I stand corrected,,,,,, dodger
In a message dated 5/26/2010 7:56:13 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
ledman_70@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Ron didn't say it was a Max Wedge, but a 426 Street Wedge car... there's
a big difference.
Dodger7998@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> After rereading your post I see that you say it was a single 4 MW
> engine, I
> have only known of one that was still on the street, and ole Don was
> running one, I had talked to him about it once, I had seen a single 4
> MW intake
> on ebay that went for big bucks, and he confirmed that it was an OEM
> part
> for me, I have a feeling that you would be able to come up with a good
> 426
> block long before you find another single 4 intake for
> one,,,,,,,,,,,,,good
> luck with what ever your direction is
>
>
> In a message dated 5/26/2010 7:25:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> Dodger7998@xxxxxxx writes:
>
>
>
> You still have not said what your intentions for the car are, and with
> out
>
> knowing what direction you are headed it is hard to give advice as to
> the
> best way to go, I personally would probably go with a stock 440 block,
>
> and
> start gathering all of the max wedge parts I could find for it, with
> the
> hopes of coming across a 426 block some day at which time the MW parts
>
> could
> be switched over to, I think that you will find a 440 with a MW top
> end
> on
> it to be beefy enough to supply plenty of fun as a weekend racer, and
> lots
> of OHHHs in it for the cruises when you open your hood
>
>
> In a message dated 5/25/2010 9:21:27 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> ${top_text_ad}
> Thanks Don I agree with what you have said. Unfortunately the 426
> block
> has
> already been hogged out. I just haven't bought it yet because of the
> over
> bore. I also have a 62 413 block, but am wary about taking it .070 and
>
> it's
> not the 426 block the car came with. The car is in the registry and
> was
> #10
> of 13 426 single 4 bbl. Cars according to Covier(sp). If I don't buy
> the
> 426
> block I will probably have to go the stroked 440 route due to cost and
> unavailability of original 426 wedge blocks. Unless some one has a
426
>
> wedge
> block out there.
> Ron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Gallimore [mailto:dongallimore@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 8:02 PM
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: test and tune
>
> First advice - don't mess up an original 426W car. There weren't that
>
> many
> and they do and will command a premium.
>
> I don't speak as an expert but a 100 over 426 is probably going to be
> too
> thin a wall. I've have a .070 413 to make it a 426 and that seems to
> be
> acceptable from what I have read over the years. I suggest you look
> into
> ultrasound testing with someone who understands the signifcance of the
>
> data
> if you are going to go that route. Or find a 440 and save that
> correct
> date
> coded 426..
>
> Akron Don Gallimore
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Ron Soldani <ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Tue, May 25, 2010 8:43:02 PM
> > Subject: RE: test and tune
> >
> > ${top_text_ad}
> Hi mike
> Thanks for the details, again an
> > awesome running machine. One of the
> 64s I have is a 426 4 spd wedge car from
> > the factory and I'm debating
> whether to put a 426 wedge block that's been
> > bored .100 (440 .030 over
> pistons) for originality or take a 440 and stroke
> > it. I'm concerned about
> the amount of overbore on the orig 426 block
> > (overheat not strong enough
> etc). Anybody out there have suggestions. I
> > haven't bought the 426 short
> block yet, but it has the right casting numbers
> > and date code for the car.
> Anyone have experience with the 426 wedge blocks
> > being bored out that much?
>
> Ron
>
> -----Original
> > Message-----
> From: mike creglow [mailto:> ymailto="mailto:mcreglow@xxxxxxxxx";
> > href="mailto:mcreglow@xxxxxxxxx";>mcreglow@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May
> > 25, 2010 10:25 AM
> To: >
> href="mailto:1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx";>1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:
> > Re: test and tune
>
> ${top_text_ad}
> hi ron,
>
> Drive train:
> Motor:
> > 400 block with 4.15" Eagle crank, Eagle 440 connecting rods,
> Ross forged
> > pistons (12.5 compression), gap-less rings, Cam Motion
> custom grind mech flat
> > tappet cam (.640"
> lift/ 283 duration @ 50), Indy SR heads that have been
> > ported to max
> wedge size (valves
> 2.19/1.81), Indy single plane intake,
> > Holley dominator (8896), MSD
> ignition system
> w/ digital 6-plus, crank
> > triggered ignition, TTI 2"/2 1/8" step headers.
>
> Transmission: A-727 w/
> > Griner reverse pattern valve body, Ultimate
> (A Lopo understudy) 5100 stall
> > converter, bolt in sprag, stock gear set,
> ultra-bell.
>
> mike
>
> On
> > Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ron Soldani <>
> ymailto="mailto:ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
> > href="mailto:ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > OHHHH YEAHHH awesome Mike. Could you let me know some engine
details?
> > I
> >
> > just gotta 64 Fury that was a drag racer and I need to put a fresh
> > motor
> in
> > it. I'd be kool if I could get some runs like that. Thx
> > Ron
>
> ${bottom_text_ad}
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of
> > interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send
> > parts/car transactions and negotiations
> as well as other personal messages
> > only to the intended recipient, not to
> the Clubhouse public address. This
> > practice will protect your privacy,
> reduce the total volume of mail and fine
> > tune the content signal to Mopar
> topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965
> > Mopar Clubhouse Discussion
> > Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html
> > and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >
>
> ${bottom_text_ad}
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of
> > interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send
> > parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal
> messages
> only
> > to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This
> practice
> > will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine
> > tune
> the
> > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse
> > Discussion Guidelines:
> > href="http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html";
target=_blank
>
> > >http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and >
> href="http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html";
> > target=_blank
> > >http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
> ${bottom_text_ad}
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as
> well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
>
> the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> reduce
> the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
> topic.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as
> well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
> the
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> reduce
> the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
> topic.
> Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
>
>
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Jeff Adams
64 Polara
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as
well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the
Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce
the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.
Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network