RE: 426 block was (Re: test and tune)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 426 block was (Re: test and tune)



Yep wish it was a max wedge, but I'm happy with the 426 4bbl wedge that it
is.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Adams [mailto:ledman_70@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 7:56 AM
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: 426 block was (Re: test and tune)


Ron didn't say it was a Max Wedge, but a 426 Street Wedge car... there's 
a big difference.
Dodger7998@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> 
> After rereading your post I see that you say it was a single 4 MW 
> engine, I 
>  have only known of one that was still on the street, and ole Don was 
> running  one, I had talked to him about it once, I had seen a single 4 
> MW intake 
> on ebay  that went for big bucks, and he confirmed that it was an OEM 
> part 
> for me, I have  a feeling that you would be able to come up with a good 
> 426 
> block long before  you find another single 4 intake for 
> one,,,,,,,,,,,,,good 
> luck with what ever  your direction is
>  
>  
> In a message dated 5/26/2010 7:25:02 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> Dodger7998@xxxxxxx writes:
> 
> 
> 
> You still have not said what your intentions for the car  are, and with 
> out 
>  
> knowing what direction you are headed it is hard  to give advice as to 
> the 
> best  way to go, I personally would probably  go with a stock 440 block, 
> 
> and 
> start  gathering all of the max wedge  parts I could find for it, with 
> the 
> hopes of  coming across a 426  block some day at which time the MW parts 
> 
> could 
> be switched  over to,  I think that you will find a 440 with a MW top 
> end 
> on 
> it to be beefy   enough to supply plenty of fun as a weekend racer, and 
> lots 
> of OHHHs   in it  for the cruises when you open your hood
> 
> 
> In a message  dated 5/25/2010 9:21:27 P.M. Central Daylight Time,   
> ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> 
> 
> Thanks Don I  agree with what you have said.  Unfortunately the 426 
> block  
> has
> already been hogged out. I just haven't  bought it yet because of  the 
> over
> bore. I also have a 62 413 block, but am  wary about taking  it .070 and 
> 
> it's
> not the 426 block the car came with. The  car is in  the registry and 
> was 
> #10
> of 13 426 single 4 bbl. Cars according  to  Covier(sp). If I don't buy 
> the 
> 426
> block I will probably have to go  the  stroked 440 route due to cost and
> unavailability of original 426  wedge  blocks. Unless some one has a 426 
> 
> wedge
> block out  there.
> Ron  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald  Gallimore  [mailto:dongallimore@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010  8:02 PM
> To:  1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: test and  tune
> 
> First advice  - don't mess up an original 426W car.   There weren't that 
> 
> many
> and  they do and will command a  premium.
> 
> I don't speak as an expert but a  100 over 426 is  probably going to be 
> too
> thin a wall.  I've have a  .070 413 to  make it a 426 and that seems to 
> be
> acceptable from what I have  read  over the years.  I suggest you look 
> into
> ultrasound testing  with  someone who understands the signifcance of the 
> 
> data
> if you are going   to go that route.  Or find a 440 and save that 
> correct  
> date
> coded  426..
> 
> Akron Don Gallimore
> 
> 
> 
> -----  Original Message  ----
> > From: Ron Soldani  <ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To:   1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Tue, May 25, 2010 8:43:02  PM
> >  Subject: RE: test and tune
> > 
> >  
> Hi  mike
> Thanks for the details, again an 
> >  awesome  running machine. One of the
> 64s I have is a 426 4 spd wedge  car from  
> > the factory and I'm debating
> whether to put a 426  wedge block  that's been 
> > bored .100 (440 .030 over
> pistons)  for originality or  take a 440 and stroke 
> > it. I'm concerned  about
> the amount of  overbore on the orig 426 block 
> > (overheat  not strong enough
> etc).  Anybody out there have suggestions. I  
> > haven't bought the 426  short
> block yet, but it has the right  casting numbers 
> > and date  code for the car.
> Anyone have  experience with the 426 wedge blocks 
> >  being bored out that  much?
> 
> Ron 
> 
> -----Original 
> >  Message-----
> From:  mike creglow [mailto:>  ymailto="mailto:mcreglow@xxxxxxxxx";  
> >  href="mailto:mcreglow@xxxxxxxxx";>mcreglow@xxxxxxxxx]  
> Sent: Tuesday, May  
> > 25, 2010 10:25 AM
> To: >   
> href="mailto:1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx";>1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:   
> > Re: test and tune
> 
> 
> hi ron,
> 
> Drive   train:
> Motor: 
> > 400 block with 4.15" Eagle crank, Eagle 440   connecting rods,
> Ross forged 
> > pistons (12.5 compression),  gap-less  rings, Cam Motion
> custom grind mech flat 
> > tappet  cam  (.640"
> lift/ 283 duration @ 50), Indy SR heads that have been  
> >  ported to max
> wedge size (valves
> 2.19/1.81), Indy single  plane intake,  
> > Holley dominator (8896), MSD
> ignition  system
> w/ digital 6-plus,  crank 
> > triggered ignition, TTI 2"/2  1/8" step  headers.
> 
> Transmission: A-727 w/ 
> > Griner reverse  pattern valve  body, Ultimate
> (A Lopo understudy) 5100 stall 
> >  converter, bolt in  sprag, stock gear  set,
> ultra-bell.
> 
> mike
> 
> On 
> > Mon, May  24, 2010 at  4:05 PM, Ron Soldani   <>
> ymailto="mailto:ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
> >   href="mailto:ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ronsold102@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >   
> > OHHHH  YEAHHH awesome Mike. Could you let me know some  engine  details?

> > I
> > 
> > just gotta 64 Fury that was a drag  racer and I  need to put a fresh 
> > motor
> in
> > it. I'd be  kool if I could  get some runs like that. Thx 
> >   Ron
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail  of  
> > interest to only one person --
> directly to that  person.   I.e., send 
> > parts/car transactions and  negotiations
> as well as  other personal messages 
> > only to the  intended recipient, not to
> the  Clubhouse public address. This  
> > practice will protect your  privacy,
> reduce the total volume  of mail and fine 
> > tune the content  signal to  Mopar
> topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 
> > Mopar   Clubhouse Discussion 
> >   Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html  
> >   and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.   
> > 
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail  --  mail of 
> > interest to only one person -- directly to that  person.   I.e., send 
> > parts/car transactions and  negotiations as well as other  personal 
> messages
> only 
> > to  the intended recipient, not to the  Clubhouse public address.  This
> practice 
> > will protect your privacy,  reduce the total  volume of mail and fine 
> > tune
> the 
> > content signal  to Mopar  topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse 
> >   Discussion Guidelines:
> >   href="http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html";
target=_blank 
>   
> > >http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and   >
> href="http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html";   
> > target=_blank 
> >   >http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> 
> 
> ----
> Please   address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- 
> directly  to  that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> negotiations  as 
> well  as other personal messages only to the intended recipient,  not to 
> 
> the 
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your  privacy, 
> reduce 
> the  total volume of mail and fine tune the content  signal to Mopar 
> topic. 
>   
> Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar  Clubhouse Discussion   Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and   
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.   
> 
> 
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to  only one person -- 
> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car  transactions and 
> negotiations as 
> well as other personal messages only to the  intended recipient, not to 
> the 
> Clubhouse public address. This practice will  protect your privacy, 
> reduce 
> the total volume of mail and fine tune the  content signal to Mopar 
> topic.  
> Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar  Clubhouse Discussion  Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and  
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 



Jeff Adams
64 Polara


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 













Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.