Re: SS Spring thing

["MO ( Steve Mick)" <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Mike I have a question . Was the 64 Fury the same body deminsions- 
wheelbase as the other 64 Plymys?  What year did Furys become a little 
larger car? ......................MO
{Steve Mick}
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mick64.html

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "mike creglow" <mcreglow@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: SS Spring thing


${top_text_ad}
steve et al,

here is what i did on my '64 fury.  i ordered a set of 456/457 (3400#)
SS springs.  i then took my original springs apart and kept the main
spring (the one with the pin and eyes for the bushings) and put the SS
leafs (minus the SS main spring) on the original main spring.
everything fit like it came from the factory with the added benefit of
the SS springs.
or you can put on the front hanger extensions.


mike



On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:04 AM, MO ( Steve Mick)
<micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes Herb, I too thought it was figgered out, until I measured mine. Maybe
> Rich K would measure his and let us know. I think his is stock length with
> added leaves-not SS. I am beginning to think not all SS springs are 
> created
> equal. Could it be that the companys that use 2" spacers be selling 
> shorter
> springs like say A body SS springs-but heavier duty? That would be cheaper
> for them to stock less springs and make more money by selling the 2"
> extensions. for B body's. Would they do something like
> that??:-).........................MO
>
>
> {Steve Mick}
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mick64.html
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Herb" <zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:05 PM
> Subject: Re: SS Spring thing
>
>
>
>
> We had this conversation about 6 Months ago on the board and every one 
> came
> to an agreement 62 / 63 20 inches no spacer and 64 / 65 22 inches two inch
> spacer for SS springs to fit. Now MO goes and throws a wrench in the game
> with a 64 with 20 inch spacing. (-: MO was your car an early production
> car that might have used 63 parts?? The conversation was about Layne
> Grissman trying to fit just the SS springs with out spacers on a 64 and 
> had
> to ultimately purchase the 2 inch spacers to have every thing align up. 
> You
> know what they say, never say never!
>
>          
> Herb
>
> 1956 Plymouth Belvedere 361
> 1959 Coronet 326 Poly
> 1963 Fury 2D/HT 6.1
> 1963 Sport Fury Convertible 361
> 1970 Challenger RT 440 - 4 Sale
> 1999 Durango SLT 5.9
> 2008 SRT-8 Magnum 6.1
> St. Louis, MO.
>
> http://1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mmo42009.html
>
>
>
>
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: MO ( Steve Mick)
> Date: 3/13/2010 8:58:32 AM
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: SS Spring thing
>
> I measured my stock springs on my 64 Dodge B body yesterday and the front
> part measured 20" . They must be stock springs, there is no front spacer.
> Herb is well informed, but something doesn't jibe--- The Question
> continues...................MO
> {Steve Mick}
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/mick64.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Herb" <zephyr9900@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 7:22 AM
> Subject: RE: SS Spring thing
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
>
>
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> negotiations
> as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
> the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
> topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.

${bottom_text_ad}
----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations 
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to 
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, 
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar 
topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and 
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. 

This email was sent to: arc.6265@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

u/?bUrDWg.bSONJP.YXJjLjYy



?p=TEXFOOTER