RE: 850 DP vs dual 4's

[Jeff Adams <ledman_70@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have an old jap bike carb synch tool (4 mercury balance tubes) that I 
think could be adapted just like Dvorak's piece. I spose you guys are 
right and a single carb is better performance-wise. If there's no power 
gain in duals, then what's the point? Thanks guys for all your input.
Steve Charette wrote:
> 
> I agree with Rich - do what you enjoy.  I personally like dual carbs, 
> even
> though I know the car would go faster with an M1 and a big Holley.  
> Whatever
> blows your hair back...
> 
> Was surprised to learn that this year's winter beater ('96 LHS) has dual
> throttle bodies.  Whoo hoo!
> 
> BTW, Dvorak makes a very cool carb synchronizer that makes balancing the
> carbs a snap.  Makes dual carbs idle smooth as silk and makes for very 
> crisp
> throttle response.  All you dual carb nuts check it out here:  
> 
> http://www.dvorakmachine.com/carb_sync.shtml
> 
> Tell mamma it will fit in a Christmas Stocking ;)
> 
> SC 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Kinsley [mailto:rlkinsley@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:14 PM
> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: 850 DP vs dual 4's
> 
> 
> As you probably know I've been playing with the dual quads on my little 
> poly
> for several years. I can't compare it to a single 4bbl as I never had 
> one on
> this engine. I found that I hated progressive linkage. I also found that 
> it
> was best to tune the carbs at the track by timeslips. When we tuned it a 
> bit
> on the dyno, till the electrical died, we had the AF ratio leaner. The 
> car
> doesn't like leaner at all. I picked up alot in the 1/8th by just 
> running it
> richer every time until the times started going in reverse. 
> 
> Single four is probably easier and most likely will use a bit less fuel 
> if
> you're always standing on it. BUT it sure has a big draw at cruise 
> night! I
> think with the right components and tune the 2X4's have a better 
> potential
> to perform. Just enjoy the project and do whatever rings your bell.
> 
> Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara 4dr 318poly w/goodies
> =====================================================================
> =====================================================================
> Dodger7998@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > my personal opinion is you will be happier with the 800/850, not sure 
> > which  you have,,,,,,,,, if you do go with the dual setup you will be 
> > happier with  vacume secondary carbs, you do have the 4 speed which 
> > would help on the
> > bog  though going with what ever,,,,,,but there is the oooohhhhhhhhh    
> > feeling of opening a hood and seeing multiple carburetion
> >  
> >  
> > In a message dated 11/25/2009 4:05:59 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
> > jake4@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > 
> > 
> > 850,  easier to tune etc. etc.
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Jeff  Adams" <ledman_70@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To:  <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 4:36  PM
> > Subject: 850 DP vs dual 4's
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > Hey guys, I plan on  replacing the sp 750 Holley on the 426 in my 64
> > > Polara this winter  with a dp 800 Holley I have. I've also been
> > > considering going to a  dual 4 setup. Which do you guys/gals think is
> > > better,  performance-wise? The dual 4 set will cost a lot more as I
> > > already  have the 850. Are dual 4's THAT much more trouble to set up and
> > > keep  adjusted? Do they perform a noticable amount better, or is it
> > > mostly  for show? The engine has headers, a 513" Lunati Voodoo cam, 
> > > small
> > >  amount of head work with smaller valves, and a 4-spd with 3:91 gears.
> > >  I'm also installing an A833 od.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----
> > > Please  address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --  
> > >  directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> > >  negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended 
> > >  recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will 
> > protect  
> > > your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the  content
> 
> > > 
> > > signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> > >
> > > '62 to  '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> > >  http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.
> > >  
> > 
> > 
> > ----
> > Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only  one person -- 
> > directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions  and 
> > negotiations as 
> > well as other personal messages only to the intended  recipient, not to 
> > the 
> > Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect  your privacy, 
> > reduce 
> > the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal  to Mopar 
> > topic.  
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion  Guidelines:
> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> Rich Kinsley '64 Dodge Polara 4dr 318poly w/goodies
> 
> 
> ----
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and 
> negotiations
> as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not 
> to
> the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
> reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to 
> Mopar
> topic.  Thanks!
> 
> '62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 
> 



Jeff Adams
64 Polara


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.