SV: 1962 Plymouth - 361 or 360?

[Knud-Erik Holm <kebh@xxxxx>]

 Thanks for the reply,

As I answered the other Gary, I want max power with minnimum cost, and
effort but of course resale value is important to. Though this car is not
being restored for resale, it's the one I want to keep. Because it is the
only one in Denmark, I have never seen or heard of any 62 sport, belvedere
or savoy in this country, around here it's a rare one of a kind.

Again thank You for your reply,

Knud-erik Holm, Denmark
(by the way we are in Afganistan and Irak with your troops:)
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Gary [mailto:spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sendt: 23. juli 2008 16:18
Til: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx
Emne: Re: 1962 Plymouth - 361 or 360?


Good points Gary. 

It is unclear to me if the goal of Knud-erik is high performance. If so, a
hopped up 360 is a good choice. Mopar Action did a similar build on a 1962
Plymouth using a 360 FI engine and were blown away with the results; they
loved it. To me that configuration is a modern street rod. (Note: no bow tie
350 in sight!)

On the other hand, the stock 361 with a 4bbl will provide provide plenty of
butt torque and move that Sport Fury effortlessly. 361 is a baby 383 in
effect. Big block torque comes naturally. :) The heads can be reworked to
use unleaded. TTI headers will work well. The 361 car is period correct.

Built right, either motor will be very reliable.

Just my 2 pennies.

I can't help him with finding a flywheel but maybe someone here can.

Thanks,
Gary H.

-----Original Message-----
>My opinion/suggestion is to build the 360 if you want Horsepower/Torque, 
>reliability; build the 361 if you want a challenge and uniqueness.
>
>Reasons why to build the 360;
>
>High Performance parts are easy to obtain and less expensive than a 361.
>
>There are many HP recipies where you can choose your performance level; ie.

>4" Stroker crank with W-2 heads and roller cam will get you 500torque & 
>500HP.
>
>Any fellow Hot-Rodder or mechanic can work with you and help you maintain
or 
>do mods without guesswork because of the 360's commonality and performance 
>record.
>
>Gary Pavlovich
 
>>  -------Original Message-------
>
>>  ... which one is the best to use in the car, the 360 is apparently a
>>  k-code, meaning very little to me. With casting #418496.2.360
>>  Additionally the heads on the 360 can use unleaded, however I will need
>to
>>  get the flywheel balanced, I am looking for the best solution and not
>>  necessary the most original one, the 361 is somewhat 100 kg more. But
has
>>  more power, the heads need leaded gas though. And then I have some
magnum
>>  exhaust manifolds for the 361. And only originals for the 360, I do not
>>  think that I have enough knowledge to make the proper choice! I need to
>make
>>  a decision as I am about to by a flywheel either for the 360 or 361, by
>the
>>  way does any one have a flywheel for sale?
>>
>>  Knud-erik Holm
 


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations
as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to
the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy,
reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar
topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html. 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.5/1568 - Release Date: 23-07-2008
06:55


----
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person.  I.e., send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

'62 to '65 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html.