i dont know i just cant remember ever seing hp stamped on a 361 i thought if you wanted the hp it was a 383 but i dont know maybee someone out there could set me straight and then i will know for sure --- On Sat, 10/2/10, Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: '62 Transmission > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Saturday, October 2, 2010, 9:38 PM > I don't know much about it, but I did > find this: > http://auto.howstuffworks.com/1962-1964-dodge-polara-5004.htm > > And it did come out of a '62 Polara 500. > > Dave > > > --- On Sat, 10/2/10, Joseph Bitterman <furyrestored@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > From: Joseph Bitterman <furyrestored@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: '62 Transmission > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > Date: Saturday, October 2, 2010, 8:24 PM > > did they make a HP 361? > > > > --- On Sat, 10/2/10, Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > From: Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: Re: '62 Transmission > > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Date: Saturday, October 2, 2010, 9:21 PM > > > Just got home from a 550 mile round > > > trip. I ended up bringing the whole shoot'n > match > > home > > > with me. Complete 361 from pan to air cleaner > (was > > > running when removed), and of course, the > > transmission > > > attached to it. I spent $200. plus about $75. > worth > > of > > > diesel - oh and a decent lunch/dinner for my > wife, who > > came > > > along. Pretty good day by my book. > > > > > > The engine supposedly has HP on it somewhere, and > it > > does > > > have a dual point distributor and a 4bbl. I > haven't > > > taken the time to look it over for numbers and > stuff > > yet - > > > pretty tired from getting on the road before > 6:00am > > and all > > > the driving. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > --- On Wed, 9/22/10, Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > From: Dave64 <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Subject: Re: '62 Transmission > > > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2010, 8:43 > AM > > > > OK, you guys have convinced me. > > > > Thanks for your great advice. It's always > great > > to > > > > take the pulse here and find out if > something is > > a > > > good deal > > > > or not. I didn't mention that this tranny > is > > for > > > sale > > > > with a running 361. But I don't need the > > engine > > > since > > > > I have my 440 already. So the seller will > sell > > me > > > the > > > > tranny separately. Just an FYI in case > anyone > > would > > > be > > > > interested in the engine. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 9/22/10, Joey <jake4@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: Joey <jake4@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Subject: Re: '62 Transmission > > > > > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2010, > 5:46 > > AM > > > > > > > > > > I save all of my 727 cores now, they > are > > getting > > > hard > > > > to > > > > > find. I sold a couple to John Cope @ > CRT a > > couple > > > of > > > > years > > > > > ago but not anymore, Steve is correct > about > > them > > > > getting > > > > > scarce. > > > > > > > > > > Joey > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "MO > ( > > Steve > > > Mick)" > > > > > <micher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 > 12:42 > > AM > > > > > Subject: Re: '62 Transmission > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hay Dave, a 62-65 TF would be > kinda > > hard to > > > find. > > > > Just > > > > > today a friend called me looking for > any TF > > that > > > would > > > > bolt > > > > > up to a 440. I said those should be > > plentyful. > > > . He > > > > > stated- not so, people around here > have > > been > > > scouting > > > > around > > > > > and buying up all they can find. > Probably > > going > > > for > > > > aluminum > > > > > salvage.........................MO > > > > > > {Steve Mick} > > > > > > http://stevemick.shutterfly.com/pictures#Part%202 > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > > "Dave64" > > > > <lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > To: <1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 > 7:59 > > PM > > > > > > Subject: Re: '62 Transmission > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks - I'm reconsidering. I > don't > > think > > > the > > > > TC > > > > > is part of it, but I would be going > with > > > something > > > > different > > > > > anyway. I'll tell my wife you guys > made me > > buy > > > > > it. :-) LOL Actually, she'd like > the > > road > > > > > trip - and she could help load it! > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 9/21/10, Gary Wilson > <Gwwilson67@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> From: Gary Wilson <Gwwilson67@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >> Subject: Re: '62 Transmission > > > > > >> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > >> Date: Tuesday, September 21, > 2010, > > 4:48 > > > PM > > > > > >> Big mistake if you pass on > it. > > They > > > > > >> are getting harder to find. > Just > > my > > > > > >> opinion. Plan a overnight trip > out > > of > > > it. > > > > Like a > > > > > mini > > > > > >> vacation. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ----- Original Message ---- > > > > > >> From: Steven Charette <stevec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > >> Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 > > 1:30:13 > > > PM > > > > > >> Subject: RE: '62 Transmission > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Dave, > > > > > >> If your '64 has pushbuttons, > > you're > > > golden. > > > > Good > > > > > >> price, IMHO. If > > > > > >> the drive is enjoyable, all > the > > better! > > > > > >> > > > > > >> SC > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > > > >> From: Dave64 [mailto:lt7dave@xxxxxxxxx] > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, > 2010 > > 4:04 > > > PM > > > > > >> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > >> Subject: Re: '62 Transmission > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Is the lever different > depending on > > if > > > it's a > > > > push > > > > > button > > > > > >> or console shift? > > > > > >> The tranny I'm looking into is > a > > push > > > button > > > > from > > > > > a '62 > > > > > >> Polara 500. The > > > > > >> price is $100. plus a couple > > hundered > > > miles > > > > of > > > > > driving. > > > > > >> It would need to be > > > > > >> rebuilt, so it's essentially > a > > core. > > > Maybe > > > > I'll > > > > > pass on > > > > > >> it. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Dave > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> --- On Mon, 9/20/10, Gary H. > <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > From: Gary H. <spigot2039@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: '62 > Transmission > > > > > >> > To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > >> > Date: Monday, September > 20, > > 2010, > > > 10:28 > > > > PM > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > No, I was thinking about > the > > > manual > > > > lever > > > > > (also known > > > > > >> as the "roster > > > > > >> > comb") on the valve body > and > > the > > > > filter. > > > > > >> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/transtech.html > > > > > >> > gives some background. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > > > >> > Gary H. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > -----Original > Message----- > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Gary, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >You mean there are > tail > > length > > > > > differences by body > > > > > >> type > > > > > >> > (B vs A, etc...) - > right? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >Dave > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >--- On Mon, 9/20/10, > Gary > > H. > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> From: Gary H. > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Yes it will bolt > up. > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> No, not all > '62-'65 > > cable > > > shift > > > > big > > > > > block > > > > > >> > transmissions are > > > > > >> > >> the same. > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> Thanks, > > > > > >> > >> Gary H. > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> -----Original > > > Message----- > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >Would a '62 > 727 > > from a > > > 361 > > > > > engine bolt > > > > > >> right > > > > > >> > up to a > > > > > >> > >> 440 and into my > '64 > > > Belvedere? > > > > In > > > > > other > > > > > >> words, > > > > > >> > are all > > > > > >> > >> '62-'65 cable > shift > > big > > > block > > > > > transmissions > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > same? > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >Thanks, > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >Dave > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > ---- > > > > > >> > Please address private > mail -- > > mail > > > of > > > > > interest to > > > > > >> only one person -- > > directly > > to > > > that > > > > person. > > > > > I.e., send parts/car > > > > > >> transactions and > > > > > >> > negotiations as well as > other > > > personal > > > > > messages only > > > > > >> to the intended > > > > > >> > recipient, not to the > > Clubhouse > > > public > > > > > address. This > > > > > >> practice will > > > > > >> > protect your privacy, > reduce > > the > > > total > > > > volume > > > > > of mail > > > > > >> and fine tune > > > > > >> > the content signal to > Mopar > > topic. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar > Clubhouse > > > Discussion > > > > > Guidelines: > > > > > >> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ---- > > > > > >> Please address private mail -- > mail > > of > > > > interest to > > > > > only one > > > > > >> person -- directly > > > > > >> to that person. I.e., send > > parts/car > > > > transactions > > > > > and > > > > > >> negotiations as well as > > > > > >> other personal messages only > to > > the > > > intended > > > > > recipient, not > > > > > >> to the Clubhouse > > > > > >> public address. This practice > will > > > protect > > > > your > > > > > privacy, > > > > > >> reduce the total volume > > > > > >> of mail and fine tune the > content > > signal > > > to > > > > Mopar > > > > > topic. > > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > > >> > > > > > >> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse > > Discussion > > > > > Guidelines: > > > > > >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > > > >> > > > > > >> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornoc--------------------- > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > Please address private mail -- > mail of > > > interest > > > > to > > > > > only one person -- directly to that > > person. > > > > > I.e., send parts/car transactions and > > > negotiations as > > > > well > > > > > as other personal messages only to the > > intended > > > > recipient, > > > > > not to the Clubhouse public address. > This > > > practice > > > > will > > > > > protect your privacy, reduce the total > > volume of > > > mail > > > > and > > > > > fine tune the content signal to Mopar > > topic. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse > > Discussion > > > > Guidelines: > > > > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > Please address private mail -- mail of > > interest > > > to > > > > only one > > > > > person -- directly to that person. > I.e., > > send > > > > > parts/car transactions and negotiations > as > > well > > > as > > > > other > > > > > personal messages only to the intended > > recipient, > > > not > > > > to the > > > > > Clubhouse public address. This > practice > > will > > > protect > > > > your > > > > > privacy, reduce the total volume of > mail and > > fine > > > tune > > > > the > > > > > content signal to Mopar topic. > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse > Discussion > > > Guidelines: > > > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and > > > > > http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >