That is apparently the case… John was saying part # was wrong. Not spring physical size… Why I was surprised like you…I thought the same spring ; they might have messed with spring rates etc I believe 57-58 had very stiff springs We put “new ones” in 300C, it sits way high now. Maybe too high. May you get what you wish for.. From: John Nowosacki [mailto:jsnowosacki@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 1:28 PM To: John Grady Cc: 2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx; Keith Simons; Chrysler300 Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Rear Springs Since wheelbase change occurred up front in subframe/nose, seems possible rear springs could work on anything in 61 or 62? On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, 'John Grady' jkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300] <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: What was different to 62, Doug, ?? when you say definitely not correct? Length of them ? If they came off 300H, how are they not correct? Part # issue only? Did they change that with wheel base reduction? If not spoken for I’ll take them. Can you strap to skid can get Estes to pick up. Any $ you incur ,I can make you whole, OK? Car sat low? Sometimes same thing has different part #’s , minor upgrades, (or downgrades , like Mopar did to wreck AMC 4.0 six JEEP pistons! Managed to wreck one of best engines made)--- does not impact use of them From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300] Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 11:53 AM To: 2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Chrysler300 Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Rear Springs My mistake - should have said 59, not 69. Definitely not correct for 62 - part #2275869 or 32240686. Guess could be correct for 59, 60 & 61. Anyone need them - free to good home - just pay shipping. Doug Warrener _____ From: "2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300] <mailto:2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx%20[Chrysler300]> " <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Chrysler300" <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 3:57:56 PM Subject: [Chrysler300] Rear Springs Hi Group, Need help identifying a set of rear springs #1946113. They came off of a 300H when I installed new Eaton springs. They were rebuilt sometime in the past, but need to be re-arcked. Does the 19 mean 1969? Thanks, Doug Warrener [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Posted by: "John Grady" <jkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ------------------------------------ To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/all/manage/edit For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to: https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/