|
What was different to 62, Doug, ?? when you say definitely not correct? Length of them ? If they came off 300H, how are they not correct? Part # issue only? Did they change that with wheel base reduction? If not spoken for I’ll take them. Can you strap to skid can get Estes to pick up. Any $ you incur ,I can make you whole, OK? Car sat low? Sometimes same thing has different part #’s , minor upgrades, (or downgrades , like Mopar did to wreck AMC 4.0 six JEEP pistons! Managed to wreck one of best engines made)--- does not impact use of them From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300] My mistake - should have said 59, not 69. Definitely not correct for 62 - part #2275869 or 32240686. Guess could be correct for 59, 60 & 61. Anyone need them - free to good home - just pay shipping. Doug Warrener From: "2HsandaHeritage@xxxxxxxxxxx [Chrysler300]" <Chrysler300-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi Group, Need help identifying a set of rear springs #1946113. They came off of a 300H when I installed new Eaton springs. They were rebuilt sometime in the past, but need to be re-arcked. Does the 19 mean 1969? Thanks, Doug Warrener __._,_.___ Posted by: "John Grady" <jkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/all/manage/edit For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/search.htm#querylang __,_._,___ |
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap