Re: [Chrysler300] Pros and cons of silicon brake fluid

["Chrysler 300" <chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I used the GTLMA in my E (xk that is) ragtop. It was a substitute for the British mineral oil stuff. Very easy on rubber parts supposedly.

I had so much left over, I now use it in my '94 Roadmaster shelfpaper woody wagon. I was told it was compatible (fingers crossed). I did a pretty good line flush . Been in there about 5,000 miles.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ron Waters 
  To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 9:13 PM
  Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] Pros and cons of silicon brake fluid


  Does anyone have any extensive experience with Castrol LMA (low moisture
  activity) ? This is what I used in my 58 Plymouth. But so far my braking
  experiences have been limited to pulling the car out of the garage and then
  driving it back in.

  Ron



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm

For archives go to http://www.forwardlook.net/300-archive/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chrysler300/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:Chrysler300-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:Chrysler300-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/