Re: [Chrysler300] RE: 64K gas tank grommet---Thanks from Dwight McGuire

["Kelly Pierce" <jkrestor300@xxxx>]

Greetings Group_
I have found this discussion interesting - especially about the part
number for a 63 fuel tank grommet. I just pulled a tank out of the 63 New
Yorker I got for parts and the filler neck is soldered in like the 62 I
r&r'ed a few years back. No brace to the body like the 64's have, and
appears that it never did. Was 63 a transition year or did I get a oddball
in the parts car???
And by the way- Still have many good J parts>>>> and all the 57 goodies.
Joe Pierce 300J+Kx3+others....
----- Original Message -----
From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxx>
To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 2:14 PM
Subject: [Chrysler300] RE: 64K gas tank grommet---Thanks from Dwight McGuire


> Just want to thank everyone for the responses to my quest for this
grommet.
> I located one @ a dealership in Illinois...it`s on the way! The last
> superceded parts # is 2880 481. It looks like the gromett used until `70
> will work for this application. There is one available from Year One as
> well #FD80481. What a great feeling to belong to a club that has so many
> dedicated members as well as the bonus of having a car (Chrysler 300!)that
> draws so much interest even from non partisan crowds!!
> Thanks again to John Hertog &
> everyone involved,
>
> Dwight
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 3:49 PM
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Chrysler300] Digest Number 613
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> There are 22 messages in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. 300H Tail lights
> From: "Mark Souders" <souders@xxxx>
> 2. Decals
> From: rondochrysler@xxxx
> 3. 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx>
> 4. Re: '62 300 race cars
> From: cotejohnr@xxxx
> 5. Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
> From: News4ge@xxxx
> 6. Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
> From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxx>
> 7. Re: '62 help - Alternators
> From: mr-320@xxxx
> 8. Power Booster Valves
> From: "jennifer allyn" <gearhead.girl@xxxx>
> 9. RE: New Hemi C 300
> From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxx>
> 10. Re: 300L Lens Trim Ring
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx>
> 11. Fw: 300L Lens Trim Ring
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx>
> 12. Re: New Hemi C 300
> From: "Owen & Jo Grigg" <ram300@xxxx>
> 13. 300L Lens Trim Ring
> From: "Jim Pristelski" <ajp002@xxxx>
> 14. 300G Project on ebay
> From: "Henry Hopkins" <hhrp@xxxx>
> 15. Re: '62 300 race cars
> From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxx>
> 16. Re: '62 help - Alternators
> From: William Huff <whuff@xxxx>
> 17. Another scam!!!!
> From: "Moana & Gerry Steinberg" <mopar@xxxx>
> 18. Re: '62 300 race cars
> From: lettercars@xxxx
> 19. RE: Another scam!!!!
> From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxx>
> 20. RE: Yet Another scam!!!!
> From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxx>
> 21. RE: `64 ram K conv.gas tank filler neck grommet part no./source
> From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxx>
> 22. 300L grille medallion
> From: "north lake real estate" <nlre01@xxxx>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:52:44 -0000
> From: "Mark Souders" <souders@xxxx>
> Subject: 300H Tail lights
>
> Hi, gang,
> Okay I give up. How in the world do these tail lights get
> installed? I'v tried about four different ways and none looks
> right. Which parts go on from inside the trunk and which parts go on
> from outside and in what order? Same thing goes for the back-up
> lights. I need to solve this dilemna before I scratch the paint or
> break my NOS light bezels. Can anyone offer some tips?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark Souders
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:34:01 EDT
> From: rondochrysler@xxxx
> Subject: Decals
>
> Hi to everyone. Can someone tell me where I might purchase the decals for
my
>
> 300C air cleaners?
> Thanks Ron
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:25:22 -0400
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx>
> Subject: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
>
> Hi to all,
>
> Trying to help Dwight locate the right grommet for his fuel tank filler
> tube, 1964 Chrysler 300K. Can someone please look up a '64 parts book
and
> confirm that the right part number is 1730087 ? (section 14) That is
what
> I come up with using a 63 parts book, can't imagine it would be different,
> but I would feel better if double-checked!
>
> You can either "reply to all" or reply to Dwight at DMcGuire@xxxx
>
> Thanks
> John
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:45:36 EDT
> From: cotejohnr@xxxx
> Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars
>
> Owen,
> The red 300H stock cars of the Bakers were probably backed or owned by
> Leonard Berger of North Carolina. I met him last month at AACA Meet in
> Greenville, S.C. where I showed my 300B. He told me Buck raced for
(with?)
>
> him on Nascar circuit with the "H" 's and that Chrysler had given him a
red
>
> 300H for his personal use. He wishes he had it now.
> He does not have the original red H that they gave him but now has a Tan
> (rare) 300H that he uses and drives to meets. It is an AACA Senior from
> several years ago but still very presentable.
> He is a member of our Club. Of interest is that he also managed most of
the
>
> real estate for the Petty's in N.C.
> I helped him with his bags into the hotel for the Greenville AACA Meet.
His
>
> room number was....................you guessed it.............Room #300
!!!!
>
> John R. Cote
> CT.
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:47:46 EDT
> From: News4ge@xxxx
> Subject: Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
>
> looks like it's a 2203 472.
>
> George Clineman
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:09:35 -0700
> From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxx>
> Subject: Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck
>
> If the number is 1730087 Brads NOS parts has 3 of them.
>
> If the number is 2203 472 Brads NOS parts has 8 of them.
>
> I am not endorsing Brads NOS in any way. I just used Partsvoice and there
> were several others who had some of one or the other but Brads seems to
have
> both of them.
> I hope that I have been some help.
>
> Charlie Valentine
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <News4ge@xxxx>
> To: <crossram@xxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler
neck
>
>
> > looks like it's a 2203 472.
> >
> > George Clineman
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:49:27 -0700 (MST)
> From: mr-320@xxxx
> Subject: Re: '62 help - Alternators
>
> i want to head off the impression that crimping is always a cheap,
> poor substitute for soldering which, if done wrong, can itself be a bad
> connection. crimping, done with the proper components and correct
> tooling is a perfectly acceptable and superior connection method; just
> as soldering done wrong can be a lousy connection.
>
> JEFF
> tucson az.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:11:56 -0700
> From: "jennifer allyn" <gearhead.girl@xxxx>
> Subject: Power Booster Valves
>
> Anyone know a source for manifold (or check) valves for 1962 type power
> booster units?
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 11:30:03 +1000
> From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxx>
> Subject: RE: New Hemi C 300
>
> It seems fairly obvious from email responses that there is fairly
widespread
>
> opposition to any attempt, or thoughts, that D-C should 're-use' 300
> letters?
>
> Rather than rely on 'someone close to D-C should, or already has' told
them
> (D-C) they should not do this, either the Club MUST IN WRITING ASK
> THEM/SUGGEST, or only 'NOT ASAP" if someone very high up in D-C can give
it
> in writing they do not intend re-using former letters!??
>
> Ed del Grande and Doug Jones, and others, raised valid points.
>
> We cannot ask that any company not re-use any name, be it Thunderbird, or
> Eldorado. We may cringe at what they chose to use it on, but that is
their
> right. This however is totally different to that.
>
> Please understand what here currently is something entirely NEW, when they
> then ALSO choose to name that new model Thunderbird, Eldorado, or 300 with
a
>
> letter or designation that belongs to a previously famed/ regarded model,
> that the new one is so dis-similar to the original!!!
>
> Surely none of you believe this new currently named '300C' that someone at
> D-C is 'officially' supplying copy to world media titled "new 300C", is
> anywhere near as outstandingly 'performance ahead or styling significant'
as
>
> the early 300s !!!?? ( Ferrari would not be so dumb to re-use one it's
> milestone names/models on 'so ordinary' an effort for the time - why
should
> D-C, you, the USA ?? )
>
> Tell them officially, "please no re-use", certainly on initially lesser
> attempts to the original chosen letters?!
>
>
> ps Liz, have already changed the oil, fixed 2 steering boxes - can you
> suggest a good polish, the harsh aussie sun seemingly affects not only our
> brains, but also the paint?
>
> Aussie Christopher
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxx>
> >To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300
> >Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400
> >
> >Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and
> >could
> >solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them.
> >
> >My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even
> >asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N.
> >
> >Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current
models?
> >Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next
> >car show!
> >
> >Elizabeth Wieland
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:41:00 -0400
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx>
> Subject: Re: 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
> For those seeking the trim ring, It is available through Emblemagic
> www.emblemagic.com . In my case I waited 6 months to get it. They require
a
> deposit of $25 up front. I believe the total cost was $60. The quality
> appears good, but since I have never seen an original one, I can't say how
> exacting a reproduction it is.
>
> Steve Galezowski
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George and Rene VerBerkmoes" <zzub@xxxx>
> To: "Steve Galezowski" <steveg@xxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Where did you get a repo trim ring? I need one for my car. If you have a
> > Point of Contact, price, lead time and telephone number it would make my
> > day. Also, could you let me know what tips you get for attaching? Thanks
> in
> > advance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > George V
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:44:34 -0400
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx>
> Subject: Fw: 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
> Sorry, it was $125. A ridiculous amount for a tiny piece of plastic. But
> when you need a part........
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx>
> To: "Fern Rivard" <crc@xxxx>; "Steve Galezowski"
> <steveg@xxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 9:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
>
> > For those seeking the trim ring, It is available through Emblemagic
> > www.emblemagic.com . In my case I waited 6 months to get it. They
require
> a
> > deposit of $25 up front. I believe the total cost was $60. The quality
> > appears good, but since I have never seen an original one, I can't say
how
> > exacting a reproduction it is.
> >
> > Steve Galezowski
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Fern Rivard" <crc@xxxx>
> > To: "Steve Galezowski" <steveg@xxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 10:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
> >
> >
> > > HI Steve:
> > > Where did you get these repro from and what do you think of the
> > quality?
> > > If it's from the source that I can't remember the name now, they
always
> > > quoted me 6 months or more to deliver but wanted payment up front! I
> need
> > > two of those trim rings as neither of my 300L's have it on. Fern in
> > > Cranbrook SE BC
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx>
> > > To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 1:33 PM
> > > Subject: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
> > >
> > >
> > > > I have a repro trim ring to be installed around the center running
> light
> > > on my L. I understand that these trim rings are prone to fall off. Can
> > > anyone offer a recommendation as to the type of adhesive to use to
> ensure
> > > the ring is on the car for a long time?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Steve Galezowski
> > > > 65 300L
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
> > > >
> > > > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > > > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > For list server instructions, go to
> > > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:38:35 +1200
> From: "Owen & Jo Grigg" <ram300@xxxx>
> Subject: Re: New Hemi C 300
>
> C'mon guys it's 2003, times have changed, "D-C" are in the business of
> selling cars to the mass market. They're not in the business of pleasing a
> small group of people that think it's still 1957.
> The "ugliness" of the current models makes our cars even more special in
my
> opinion.
> Accept it and get on with life.
> My 2c worth
> Owen
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: christopher beilby <thelastbestgenius@xxxx>
> To: <EWieland@xxxx>; <chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:30 PM
> Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300
>
>
> > It seems fairly obvious from email responses that there is fairly
> widespread
> > opposition to any attempt, or thoughts, that D-C should 're-use' 300
> > letters?
> >
> > Rather than rely on 'someone close to D-C should, or already has' told
> them
> > (D-C) they should not do this, either the Club MUST IN WRITING ASK
> > THEM/SUGGEST, or only 'NOT ASAP" if someone very high up in D-C can give
> it
> > in writing they do not intend re-using former letters!??
> >
> > Ed del Grande and Doug Jones, and others, raised valid points.
> >
> > We cannot ask that any company not re-use any name, be it Thunderbird,
or
> > Eldorado. We may cringe at what they chose to use it on, but that is
> their
> > right. This however is totally different to that.
> >
> > Please understand what here currently is something entirely NEW, when
they
> > then ALSO choose to name that new model Thunderbird, Eldorado, or 300
with
> a
> > letter or designation that belongs to a previously famed/ regarded
model,
> > that the new one is so dis-similar to the original!!!
> >
> > Surely none of you believe this new currently named '300C' that someone
at
> > D-C is 'officially' supplying copy to world media titled "new 300C", is
> > anywhere near as outstandingly 'performance ahead or styling
significant'
> as
> > the early 300s !!!?? ( Ferrari would not be so dumb to re-use one it's
> > milestone names/models on 'so ordinary' an effort for the time - why
> should
> > D-C, you, the USA ?? )
> >
> > Tell them officially, "please no re-use", certainly on initially lesser
> > attempts to the original chosen letters?!
> >
> >
> > ps Liz, have already changed the oil, fixed 2 steering boxes - can you
> > suggest a good polish, the harsh aussie sun seemingly affects not only
our
> > brains, but also the paint?
> >
> > Aussie Christopher
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxx>
> > >To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300
> > >Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400
> > >
> > >Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and
> > >could
> > >solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them.
> > >
> > >My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my
even
> > >asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a
300N.
> > >
> > >Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current
> models?
> > >Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the
next
> > >car show!
> > >
> > >Elizabeth Wieland
> > >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to
> > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp
> >
> >
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:09:30 -0500
> From: "Jim Pristelski" <ajp002@xxxx>
> Subject: 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
> If anyone needs the pot metal trim ring for the 1965 300L grille
medallion,
> I have a nice original one. No pitting, nice chrome, complete with
original
> mounting studs, P/N 2575091, for $125. Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Galezowski [mailto:stevenlulu@xxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:45 PM
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Fw: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
>
> Sorry, it was $125. A ridiculous amount for a tiny piece of plastic. But
> when you need a part........
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:14:59 -0700
> From: "Henry Hopkins" <hhrp@xxxx>
> Subject: 300G Project on ebay
>
> Located in San Diego. Check out photos. Present owner in the club?
Looks
> as if everything is there but still quite a project.
>
> And what about the 58 D that has no bids as yet starting out at $15,100?
> And the 55C300 ending up tomorrow afternoon.
>
> Lots of 300's out there suddenly.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 22:59:03 -0500
> From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxx>
> Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars
>
> Hi all;
> Leonard joined the club some months before the Spencer, NC meet, hosted by
> Rev. Carl Kreps. He was then retired from Petty Ent., and was instrimental
> in getting the club access to the racing shops at Petty Ent. The members
> toured where the public is not allowed, and some of us were lead by Lee
> Petty, himself.
> He also got us into Charlotte (Lowe's) Speedway where we had lunch in the
> private Clubhouse overlooking the track. We were also allowed to park our
> cars on the sidewalk in front of the Main entrance and had pictures taken
> there. In add'n, he had Tim Flock there at lunch as a special guest. Tim
> signed copies of the famous drawing of the 300's side by side on the
Daytona
> bank, some had their dashes/gloveboxes signed.
> He arranged other things for us, which enhanced Carl's meet, and made it
> truly special. Lee Petty and Tim flock are gone now and most of us would
> have never met them had it not been for Leonard, and we all thank him
again.
>
> These things are the fabric of our meets, most of them special in their
own
> way, and the members who skip them are missing many great experiences. If
> you haven't made a meet, just do it. I promise you, you'll want to come
> again!
>
> Get those registration forms in, please, and we'll see/meet ya there!
> Ray Jones, Meet Coordinator
>
> > From: cotejohnr@xxxx
> > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:45:36 EDT
> > To: ram300@xxxx, Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] '62 300 race cars
> >
> > Owen,
> > The red 300H stock cars of the Bakers were probably backed or owned by
> > Leonard Berger of North Carolina. I met him last month at AACA Meet in
> > Greenville, S.C. where I showed my 300B. He told me Buck raced for
> (with?)
> > him on Nascar circuit with the "H" 's and that Chrysler had given him a
> red
> > 300H for his personal use. He wishes he had it now.
> > He does not have the original red H that they gave him but now has a Tan
> > (rare) 300H that he uses and drives to meets. It is an AACA Senior from
> > several years ago but still very presentable.
> > He is a member of our Club. Of interest is that he also managed most of
> the
> > real estate for the Petty's in N.C.
> > I helped him with his bags into the hotel for the Greenville AACA Meet.
> His
> > room number was....................you guessed it.............Room #300
> !!!!
> >
> > John R. Cote
> > CT.
> >
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
> > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 01:15:54 -0400
> From: William Huff <whuff@xxxx>
> Subject: Re: '62 help - Alternators
>
> Well said Jeff. However, I would wager that the average home mechanic
does
> not have the proper terminals, nor the proper crimping/staking tools to
> make connections that will reliably handle the 50+ amps that an alternator
> charging circuit can carry. The wire size should probably be #10 or
> #8. Those light duty terminals that one sees in the plastic box kits
don't
> cut it in my opinion. The crimping tools that come with those kits also
> leave much to be desired. If you spend the money for good components,
> and use them correctly, then probably crimping alone is ok. What might
> work ok for short cruises could leave you stranded on a long night trip
> with headlights, a good stereo and maybe an A/C going if a bad connection
> exists. Soldering requires a good mechanical connection prior to the
> soldering taking place, clean connections and a proper technique. Over
the
> years, I have always soldered my crimp connections (after crimping) when I
> intended that they would become a permanent installation on my boats and
> also my cars. So far I have been lucky enough to not have any failures
> from those connections I completed in that manner.
>
> Bill Huff
>
>
> At 4/30/03 -0700 03:49 PM, you wrote:
> > i want to head off the impression that crimping is always a cheap,
> >poor substitute for soldering which, if done wrong, can itself be a bad
> >connection. crimping, done with the proper components and correct
> >tooling is a perfectly acceptable and superior connection method; just
> >as soldering done wrong can be a lousy connection.
> >
> > JEFF
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:17:52 -0700
> From: "Moana & Gerry Steinberg" <mopar@xxxx>
> Subject: Another scam!!!!
>
> Hi all: Just received this, sounds like another one of those
> African scams. Yeh, sure send him a copy of your Driver's
> License. We may be dumb at times, but not stupid.
> Beware.
> Gerry Steinberg,
> Arizona
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Damara" <damara1@xxxx>
> To: <mopar@xxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:17 PM
> Subject: Hello
>
>
> Greetings Friend,
>
> First, let me introduce myself, then the essence of this contact.
>
> I am Mr Peter Damara, Bank Manager of United Bank For Africa , Capetown
> Branch. I have urgent and very confidential business proposition for you.
On
> June 6 1998, a gold marchant/contractor with the Randgold Exploration
> Company, Mr. Jim Smith made a numbered time (Fixed) deposited for twelve
> calendar months, valued at US$25,000,000.00 (Twenty-five Million Dollars)
in
> my branch.
>
> Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to his forwarding address but
> got no reply. After a month, we sent a reminder and finally we discovered
> from his contract employers, Randgold Exploration company Ltd that Mr. Jim
> Smith died from an automobile accident. On further investigation, I found
> out that he did not leave a WILL and all attempts to trace his next of kin
> were fruitless.
> I therefore made further investigation and discovered that Mr. Jim Smith
did
> not declare any next of kin in all his official documents, including his
> Bank Deposit paperwork.
> This sum of US$25,000,000.00 is still sitting in the Bank and the interest
> is being rolled over with the principal sum at the end of each year. No
one
> will come forward to claim it. According to the South African Law, at the
> expiration of 5 (five) years, the money will revert to the ownership of
the
> South African Government if nobody applies to claim the funds.
> Consequently, my proposal is that I will like you as a foreigner to stand
in
> as the next of kin to Mr. Jim Smith so that the fruits of this old man's
> labour will not get into the hands of some corrupt officials. This is
> simple, I will like you to provide me immediately with your full names and
> address so that the attorney will prepare the necessary documents and
> affidavits,which will put you in place as the next of kin.
> I would also like you to scan you drivers license for me.
> We shall employ the services of two attorneys for drafting and
notarization
> of the WILL and obtain the necessary documents and letter of
> probate/administration in your favour for the transfer.A bank account in
any
> part of the world, which you provide, will then facilitate the transfer of
> this money to you as the beneficiary/next of kin. The money will be paid
> into your account for us to share in the ratio of 60% for me and 40% for
> you.
> There is no risk at all as all the paperwork for this transaction will be
> done by the attorney and my position as the Branch Manager guarantees the
> successful execution of this transaction.
>
> If you are interested, please reply immediately. Upon your response, I
shall
> then provide you with more details and relevant documents that will help
you
> understand.
> Please observe utmost confidentiality, and rest assured that this
> transaction would be most profitable for both of us because I shall
require
> your assistance to invest my share in your country.
>
> Awaiting your urgent reply via email.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Peter Damara
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:00:33 EDT
> From: lettercars@xxxx
> Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars
>
> Ray, thanks for bringing up the Spencer meet. It certainly was
outstanding.
>
> I have all of Tim Flock's talk on tape. Who would have thought he would
> have
> been gone just a year or two later? Oh, yes, and then there was the chat
> with King Richard himself, in the parking lot after the Petty Enterprises
> tour. (A few of us were still hanging around--- having a little
> refreshment!)
> Regarding the Baker race cars. I would certainly doubt they were 300Hs.
> Why
> pay for all the extras not needed in a race car----especially that
interior?
>
> I don't know if any pictures exist of the cars from the rear, but I would
be
>
> very surprised to see any "Hs" on the deck lids! Maybe someone more
> knowledgable in old NASCAR stuff could enlighten us on that. Other racing
> 1962s like Brock's, Granatelli's, and Faubel's were not lettercars. I
did
> buy one of the pictures on ebay referred to. A little fuzzy, as the
seller
> warned, but pretty cool to hang on the wall. 300ly, Gil
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 06:46:03 -0700
> From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxx>
> Subject: RE: Another scam!!!!
>
> To all club members:
>
>
>
> I would like to add another potential scam.
>
>
>
> I regularly transact business on E$$BAY and like to use P0
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Moana & Gerry Steinberg [mailto:mopar@xxxx]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 11:18 PM
>
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Subject: [Chrysler300] Another scam!!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all: Just received this, sounds like another one of those
>
> African scams. Yeh, sure send him a copy of your Driver's
>
> License. We may be dumb at times, but not stupid.
>
> Beware.
>
> Gerry Steinberg,
>
> Arizona
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 20
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 07:35:17 -0700
> From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxx>
> Subject: RE: Yet Another scam!!!!
>
> To all club members:
>
>
>
> I would like to add yet another potential scam.
>
>
>
> (Sorry, I accidentally sent this out before I added the details.)
>
>
>
> I regularly transact business on E$$BAY and USED to use Paypal (which by
the
> way is now owned by E-Bay). Well recently I received an E-Mail from
> "someone" which had what looked like an official Paypal logo and a return
> address of "paysecurity@xxxx" informing me that "Paypal" was
> conducting a periodic update of members to check their records on inactive
> accounts and non functioning mailboxes. This E-Mail included a form which
> asked for my e-mail address, password, name, billing address, credit card
> number, expiration date, and pin number. I am surprised that they did not
> also ask for my social security number and my mothers maiden name.
>
>
>
> This form was a regular html document and did NOT indicate that it was
using
> any form of encryption technology.
>
>
>
> I immediately sent off an E-Mail to Paypal informing them of this E-Mail
and
> giving them the senders E-Mail address. In searching for scams on the
> internet, it seems that there have been numerous occurrences of this type
of
> thing recently, with PayPal and other organizations.
>
>
>
> Bottom line, if anyone asks for any type of personal information ---DO NOT
> send them anything. Immediately contact the real organization, using the
> normal internet address that you use to enter their site and notify them
> that you just received such a request. You might also send an E-Mail to
the
> FBI Internet Fraud Division at http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp. Check
> this site out yourself - It looks to be an authentic government site and
not
> yet another scam organization.
>
>
>
> The bottom line is to always be cautious and suspicious of anyone EVER
> asking for ANY information from you. Sorry if this sounds paranoid, but
you
> can never be too careful these days.
>
>
>
> Now to make this post official for the listserver and related to our
300's.
> I must mention that I love my 1962 Chrysler 300 "Sport" convertible and
the
> weather is getting very nice for taking it out for a drive.
>
>
>
> Be Careful and happy cruising,
>
>
>
> John Mc Adams
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 21
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:33:41 -0400
> From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxx>
> Subject: RE: `64 ram K conv.gas tank filler neck grommet part no./source
>
> Hello to All,
> I still haven`t had any luck locating a filler neck grommet for the
> K.....have part #1730087 from John & #2303472 from a local dealer
> (Louisville,KY) but am being told by three different dealers they are not
> available through Chrysler. I checked with Year One on a lead but no luck
> either. Can anyone comfirm this part no. or provide any other sources? I`m
> itching to take the new addition (my 1st letter car!) on it`s maiden
voyage!
> Thanks in advance,
> Dwight
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:44 AM
> To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Chrysler300] Digest Number 612
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> There are 9 messages in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. Fuel Pump Application?
> From: "Wayne Graefen" <wgraefen@xxxx>
> 2. Re: New Hemi C 300
> From: "Thomas Miller" <tfm@xxxx>
> 3. RE: New Hemi C 300
> From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxx>
> 4. 300c / "concept" car
> From: oldeiron@xxxx
> 5. Re: rear end housing swap
> From: GERALD OLSON <olson77@xxxx>
> 6. Carb Question
> From: pennsy300@xxxx
> 7. Fw: 300-C parts
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx>
> 8. 300L Lens Trim Ring
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx>
> 9. Chrysler 300 Spring Meet
> From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxx>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:13:30 -0500
> From: "Wayne Graefen" <wgraefen@xxxx>
> Subject: Fuel Pump Application?
>
> The M2501S Carter fuel pump is the "early" pump for '57 Plymouth, Dodge
and
> DeSoto V8s only, like my '57 DeSoto Firedome.
>
> Wayne
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:30:32 -0400
> From: "Park Waldrop" <pwald@xxxx>
> Subject: Fuel Pump Application?
>
> Anyone have a Carter fuel pump application list? I have an M2501S pump
that
> appears to be a good rebuildable unit, but don't know what it goes on
(came
> in box of spares for my C cpe).
>
> Park Waldrop
> Atlanta
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:24:05 -0400
> From: "Thomas Miller" <tfm@xxxx>
> Subject: Re: New Hemi C 300
>
> Okay gang, figure it out. The "C" stands for CONCEPT.
>
> As far as history goes, I see plenty of it at:
>
> http://www.chrysler.com/design/vehicle_design/history/eras/ .
>
> Oh, and what about clubs? Try
>
> http://www.chrysler.com/design/vehicle_design/car_clubs/
>
> where you'll see the 300 Club Intl. mentioned by name.
>
> And, as far as the dealers go, well lots of them are just that.
> Dealers. Over the years, I found that some are into cars, and some
> might just as well be selling tractors. I remember very proudly
> displaying my 300C on the showroom floor of a local Chrysler dealership
> soon after I purchased it. The General Manager of the dealership is a
> good friend of mine and knows the heritage of the lettercars. His Sales
> Manager at the time thought my car was really neat, was glad to have it
> on the floor next to a '99, but didn't understand the whole letter thing
> and referred to it as a '57 300M. <grin>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Thomas F. Miller
>
> tfm@xxxx
> pageTFM@xxxx / text paging
> 614.975.4164 / voice
> 707.667.2601 / eFax
>
> 300C, 300M
>
> >>> <fastedgie@xxxx> 4/29/2003 12:14:47 AM >>>
>
> Why is the new Chrysler a 300 Hemi C?????
> What has the C got to do with the current name.
> The letter 'C' in 1957 had a special designation earned as a
> performance vehicle in a series of Letter cars. These special letter
> cars became sought after collectibles because of their special impact on
> the history automobile and in particular to the making of a great
> company, Chrysler Corporation.
> But what the hell has the C got to do with the 2005 model year?
> Especially when the 'C' follows the 'M' car a mass produced non
> collector car??
> It's obvious the current marketers at DCX are right out of touch with
> reality. They want to capitalize on the marketing value of the Letter
> Cars, but they fail to see the need to protect the real letter cars from
> the rank and file.
> The current management should take a lesson from Chrysler management of
> the 50's and early 60's. They too saw the value of capitalizing on the
> Chrysler 300 name. But they protected the letter cars by dropping the
> letters on the mass produced 300's of that time period. Even Iacocca
> saw they importance of the special status of the Letter cars by
> designating the 79 Chrysler 300 as a letterless car., not withstanding
> what he did to the Charger name. ( Charger 2.2, what a laugh on Dodge's
> history)
> The current 300 M should never have been a letter car, it's way too
> late to fix it. But to go from the 'M' to a 'C' is absolutely senseless
> and without any marketing advantage. And in common English, it's
> confusing and alphebetically incorrect.
> In the future when a 300 Club Member is called upon to explain the
> special significance of the Letter Cars, he will indeed, have to explain
> the meaning of stupidity. The unfortunate thing is there is no law
> against it.
>
> Ed Del Grande
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
> http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> ----------
>
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:2.1
> X-GWTYPE:USER
> FN:"tfm@xxxx".GWIA.Zippynet
> EMAIL;WORK;PREF:tfm@xxxx
> N:"tfm@xxxx".GWIA.Zippynet
> END:VCARD
>
> BEGIN:VCARD
> VERSION:2.1
> X-GWTYPE:USER
> FN:Thomas Miller
> TEL;WORK:614.975.4164
> TEL;PREF;FAX:614.263.9913
> EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:TFM@xxxx
> N:Miller;Thomas
> TITLE:Head Loser
> END:VCARD
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400
> From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxx>
> Subject: RE: New Hemi C 300
>
> Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and
could
> solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them.
>
> My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even
> asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N.
>
> Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current
models?
> Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next
> car show!
>
> Elizabeth Wieland
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:47:23 -0500 (EST)
> From: oldeiron@xxxx
> Subject: 300c / "concept" car
>
> re:Elizabeth Wieland mssg --ditto !
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:23:53 -0400
> From: GERALD OLSON <olson77@xxxx>
> Subject: Re: rear end housing swap
>
> John, I have a 1970 323 surgrip in my 61 wagon. Had to move the spring
> perches 3/8 in. outboard. Howard Stoll did it for me years ago. Hope
> lhis helps---Jerry
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx>
> Date: Monday, April 28, 2003 11:37 pm
> Subject: [Chrysler300] rear end housing swap
>
> > Thank you all who responded to the bearing question re: rear ends.
> > Very
> > informative replies. I can't find the time to answer each one
> > individually.So - thank you all !
> >
> > Another question, please, to this group: could somebody tell me
> > specificallywhat rear end assembly, complete, from a later Mopar
> > without the tapered
> > axles will fit under, say, a 60 thru 64 Chrysler 300? The few
> > that I have
> > measured have had different spacings between the rear spring
> > perches. I do
> > know that this swap is do-able, I have seen it done, and, indeed,
> > my 300G
> > convert. has such a rear end under it now, but I didn't do it !
> >
> > No, I am not thinking of doing this modification to a Letter car.
> > But I
> > would like to do it to my '62 NYker wagon, and would like to
> > locate and buy,
> > in a junkyard, a complete suitable rear end asembly. Just not
> > sure what
> > matches up...
> >
> > Sincerely
> > John
> >
> >
> > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
> > -~-->
> > Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important
> > Questions.http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/AG3JAA/8LmulB/TM
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --~->
> >
> > To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > For list server instructions, go to
> > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:12:41 EDT
> From: pennsy300@xxxx
> Subject: Carb Question
>
> I know there was a factory service bulletin concerning hesitation and
> surging
> on acceleration for the 300 D. Does this bulletin call for the
modification
>
> of both carburators, or only the rear, primary carb? And does anybody
know
> of a vendor or source for someone who can perform the required mods?
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:31:43 -0400
> From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx>
> Subject: Fw: 300-C parts
>
> Hi to all,
>
> Here you go - 300C parts for sale. Please contact seller directly if any
> interest, I just rec'd his e-mail, that's all I know...
>
> John
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug Ahern" <doug.ahern@xxxx>
> To: <crossram@xxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 3:31 PM
> Subject: 300-C parts
>
>
> >
> > I have some NOS 300-C parts for sale, do you know anyone restoring
> > a 300-C? I have emblems (side 1/4 panel emblem, grille emblem), a
> > grille, fenders and a few other items.
> >
> > the 300's on your site are very nice. good site!
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Doug Ahern
> > Athens, GA
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:33:31 -0400
> From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx>
> Subject: 300L Lens Trim Ring
>
> I have a repro trim ring to be installed around the center running light
on
> my L. I understand that these trim rings are prone to fall off. Can anyone
> offer a recommendation as to the type of adhesive to use to ensure the
ring
> is on the car for a long time?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve Galezowski
> 65 300L
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 18:03:13 -0500
> From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxx>
> Subject: Chrysler 300 Spring Meet
>
> ATTENTION: To all those planning to attend the meet and haven't yet
> registered or reserved a hotel room.
>
> We have received only 17 mail in registrations so far!
> The Battle Creek Inn, as of today, has received 31 reservations.
> Reservation deadline is May 21 at hotel. That leaves you 3 weeks!
>
> Come on folks, help us out here. We need to get these in as early as
> possable to ease the load on the office staff.
> The meet is in 41 days! We expect everyone there!!! It's goona be a
good'n.
>
> The upcoming NewsFlite will have another registration form included in it.
> That issue should be out to all members by end of this week or first of
next
> week.
>
> Ray Jones, Meet Coordinator
> Y'all come now, y'hear?
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:45:43 -0700
> From: "north lake real estate" <nlre01@xxxx>
> Subject: 300L grille medallion
>
> I need the plastic lens cover for this running light. Can anyone help me
out
> with this. Emblemagic did not seem to have these. I've got the metal piece
> but someone chose to break the lens cover. I do have all the pieces, maybe
> there is some way to "glue?" it back together?
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>