RE: 64K gas tank grommet---Thanks from Dwight McGuire

From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxx>

Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 16:14:09 -0400

Just want to thank everyone for the responses to my quest for this grommet. I located one @ a dealership in Illinois...it`s on the way! The last superceded parts # is 2880 481. It looks like the gromett used until `70 will work for this application. There is one available from Year One as well #FD80481. What a great feeling to belong to a club that has so many dedicated members as well as the bonus of having a car (Chrysler 300!)that draws so much interest even from non partisan crowds!! Thanks again to John Hertog & everyone involved, Dwight -----Original Message----- From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 3:49 PM To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Chrysler300] Digest Number 613 To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are 22 messages in this issue. Topics in this digest: 1. 300H Tail lights From: "Mark Souders" <souders@xxxx> 2. Decals From: rondochrysler@xxxx 3. 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx> 4. Re: '62 300 race cars From: cotejohnr@xxxx 5. Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck From: News4ge@xxxx 6. Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxx> 7. Re: '62 help - Alternators From: mr-320@xxxx 8. Power Booster Valves From: "jennifer allyn" <gearhead.girl@xxxx> 9. RE: New Hemi C 300 From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxx> 10. Re: 300L Lens Trim Ring From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx> 11. Fw: 300L Lens Trim Ring From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx> 12. Re: New Hemi C 300 From: "Owen & Jo Grigg" <ram300@xxxx> 13. 300L Lens Trim Ring From: "Jim Pristelski" <ajp002@xxxx> 14. 300G Project on ebay From: "Henry Hopkins" <hhrp@xxxx> 15. Re: '62 300 race cars From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxx> 16. Re: '62 help - Alternators From: William Huff <whuff@xxxx> 17. Another scam!!!! From: "Moana & Gerry Steinberg" <mopar@xxxx> 18. Re: '62 300 race cars From: lettercars@xxxx 19. RE: Another scam!!!! From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxx> 20. RE: Yet Another scam!!!! From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxx> 21. RE: `64 ram K conv.gas tank filler neck grommet part no./source From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxx> 22. 300L grille medallion From: "north lake real estate" <nlre01@xxxx> ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 1 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:52:44 -0000 From: "Mark Souders" <souders@xxxx> Subject: 300H Tail lights Hi, gang, Okay I give up. How in the world do these tail lights get installed? I'v tried about four different ways and none looks right. Which parts go on from inside the trunk and which parts go on from outside and in what order? Same thing goes for the back-up lights. I need to solve this dilemna before I scratch the paint or break my NOS light bezels. Can anyone offer some tips? Thanks, Mark Souders ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:34:01 EDT From: rondochrysler@xxxx Subject: Decals Hi to everyone. Can someone tell me where I might purchase the decals for my 300C air cleaners? Thanks Ron [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:25:22 -0400 From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx> Subject: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck Hi to all, Trying to help Dwight locate the right grommet for his fuel tank filler tube, 1964 Chrysler 300K. Can someone please look up a '64 parts book and confirm that the right part number is 1730087 ? (section 14) That is what I come up with using a 63 parts book, can't imagine it would be different, but I would feel better if double-checked! You can either "reply to all" or reply to Dwight at DMcGuire@xxxx Thanks John ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:45:36 EDT From: cotejohnr@xxxx Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars Owen, The red 300H stock cars of the Bakers were probably backed or owned by Leonard Berger of North Carolina. I met him last month at AACA Meet in Greenville, S.C. where I showed my 300B. He told me Buck raced for (with?) him on Nascar circuit with the "H" 's and that Chrysler had given him a red 300H for his personal use. He wishes he had it now. He does not have the original red H that they gave him but now has a Tan (rare) 300H that he uses and drives to meets. It is an AACA Senior from several years ago but still very presentable. He is a member of our Club. Of interest is that he also managed most of the real estate for the Petty's in N.C. I helped him with his bags into the hotel for the Greenville AACA Meet. His room number was....................you guessed it.............Room #300 !!!! John R. Cote CT. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:47:46 EDT From: News4ge@xxxx Subject: Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck looks like it's a 2203 472. George Clineman [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:09:35 -0700 From: "Charlie Valentine" <cross.ram@xxxx> Subject: Re: 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck If the number is 1730087 Brads NOS parts has 3 of them. If the number is 2203 472 Brads NOS parts has 8 of them. I am not endorsing Brads NOS in any way. I just used Partsvoice and there were several others who had some of one or the other but Brads seems to have both of them. I hope that I have been some help. Charlie Valentine ----- Original Message ----- From: <News4ge@xxxx> To: <crossram@xxxx>; <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:47 PM Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 64 Ram K conv.- grommet for gas tank filler neck > looks like it's a 2203 472. > > George Clineman > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > To send a message to this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:49:27 -0700 (MST) From: mr-320@xxxx Subject: Re: '62 help - Alternators i want to head off the impression that crimping is always a cheap, poor substitute for soldering which, if done wrong, can itself be a bad connection. crimping, done with the proper components and correct tooling is a perfectly acceptable and superior connection method; just as soldering done wrong can be a lousy connection. JEFF tucson az. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:11:56 -0700 From: "jennifer allyn" <gearhead.girl@xxxx> Subject: Power Booster Valves Anyone know a source for manifold (or check) valves for 1962 type power booster units? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 9 Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 11:30:03 +1000 From: "christopher beilby" <thelastbestgenius@xxxx> Subject: RE: New Hemi C 300 It seems fairly obvious from email responses that there is fairly widespread opposition to any attempt, or thoughts, that D-C should 're-use' 300 letters? Rather than rely on 'someone close to D-C should, or already has' told them (D-C) they should not do this, either the Club MUST IN WRITING ASK THEM/SUGGEST, or only 'NOT ASAP" if someone very high up in D-C can give it in writing they do not intend re-using former letters!?? Ed del Grande and Doug Jones, and others, raised valid points. We cannot ask that any company not re-use any name, be it Thunderbird, or Eldorado. We may cringe at what they chose to use it on, but that is their right. This however is totally different to that. Please understand what here currently is something entirely NEW, when they then ALSO choose to name that new model Thunderbird, Eldorado, or 300 with a letter or designation that belongs to a previously famed/ regarded model, that the new one is so dis-similar to the original!!! Surely none of you believe this new currently named '300C' that someone at D-C is 'officially' supplying copy to world media titled "new 300C", is anywhere near as outstandingly 'performance ahead or styling significant' as the early 300s !!!?? ( Ferrari would not be so dumb to re-use one it's milestone names/models on 'so ordinary' an effort for the time - why should D-C, you, the USA ?? ) Tell them officially, "please no re-use", certainly on initially lesser attempts to the original chosen letters?! ps Liz, have already changed the oil, fixed 2 steering boxes - can you suggest a good polish, the harsh aussie sun seemingly affects not only our brains, but also the paint? Aussie Christopher >From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxx> >To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300 >Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400 > >Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and >could >solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them. > >My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even >asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N. > >Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current models? >Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next >car show! > >Elizabeth Wieland > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 10 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:41:00 -0400 From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx> Subject: Re: 300L Lens Trim Ring For those seeking the trim ring, It is available through Emblemagic www.emblemagic.com . In my case I waited 6 months to get it. They require a deposit of $25 up front. I believe the total cost was $60. The quality appears good, but since I have never seen an original one, I can't say how exacting a reproduction it is. Steve Galezowski ----- Original Message ----- From: "George and Rene VerBerkmoes" <zzub@xxxx> To: "Steve Galezowski" <steveg@xxxx> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 6:01 PM Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring > Hi Steve, > > Where did you get a repo trim ring? I need one for my car. If you have a > Point of Contact, price, lead time and telephone number it would make my > day. Also, could you let me know what tips you get for attaching? Thanks in > advance. > > Regards, > George V > > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 11 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:44:34 -0400 From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx> Subject: Fw: 300L Lens Trim Ring Sorry, it was $125. A ridiculous amount for a tiny piece of plastic. But when you need a part........ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx> To: "Fern Rivard" <crc@xxxx>; "Steve Galezowski" <steveg@xxxx> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 9:37 PM Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring > For those seeking the trim ring, It is available through Emblemagic > www.emblemagic.com . In my case I waited 6 months to get it. They require a > deposit of $25 up front. I believe the total cost was $60. The quality > appears good, but since I have never seen an original one, I can't say how > exacting a reproduction it is. > > Steve Galezowski > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fern Rivard" <crc@xxxx> > To: "Steve Galezowski" <steveg@xxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 10:59 AM > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring > > > > HI Steve: > > Where did you get these repro from and what do you think of the > quality? > > If it's from the source that I can't remember the name now, they always > > quoted me 6 months or more to deliver but wanted payment up front! I need > > two of those trim rings as neither of my 300L's have it on. Fern in > > Cranbrook SE BC > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx> > > To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 1:33 PM > > Subject: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring > > > > > > > I have a repro trim ring to be installed around the center running light > > on my L. I understand that these trim rings are prone to fall off. Can > > anyone offer a recommendation as to the type of adhesive to use to ensure > > the ring is on the car for a long time? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Steve Galezowski > > > 65 300L > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups > > > > > > To send a message to this group, send an email to: > > > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > For list server instructions, go to > > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 12 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:38:35 +1200 From: "Owen & Jo Grigg" <ram300@xxxx> Subject: Re: New Hemi C 300 C'mon guys it's 2003, times have changed, "D-C" are in the business of selling cars to the mass market. They're not in the business of pleasing a small group of people that think it's still 1957. The "ugliness" of the current models makes our cars even more special in my opinion. Accept it and get on with life. My 2c worth Owen ----- Original Message ----- From: christopher beilby <thelastbestgenius@xxxx> To: <EWieland@xxxx>; <chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:30 PM Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300 > It seems fairly obvious from email responses that there is fairly widespread > opposition to any attempt, or thoughts, that D-C should 're-use' 300 > letters? > > Rather than rely on 'someone close to D-C should, or already has' told them > (D-C) they should not do this, either the Club MUST IN WRITING ASK > THEM/SUGGEST, or only 'NOT ASAP" if someone very high up in D-C can give it > in writing they do not intend re-using former letters!?? > > Ed del Grande and Doug Jones, and others, raised valid points. > > We cannot ask that any company not re-use any name, be it Thunderbird, or > Eldorado. We may cringe at what they chose to use it on, but that is their > right. This however is totally different to that. > > Please understand what here currently is something entirely NEW, when they > then ALSO choose to name that new model Thunderbird, Eldorado, or 300 with a > letter or designation that belongs to a previously famed/ regarded model, > that the new one is so dis-similar to the original!!! > > Surely none of you believe this new currently named '300C' that someone at > D-C is 'officially' supplying copy to world media titled "new 300C", is > anywhere near as outstandingly 'performance ahead or styling significant' as > the early 300s !!!?? ( Ferrari would not be so dumb to re-use one it's > milestone names/models on 'so ordinary' an effort for the time - why should > D-C, you, the USA ?? ) > > Tell them officially, "please no re-use", certainly on initially lesser > attempts to the original chosen letters?! > > > ps Liz, have already changed the oil, fixed 2 steering boxes - can you > suggest a good polish, the harsh aussie sun seemingly affects not only our > brains, but also the paint? > > Aussie Christopher > > > > > >From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxx> > >To: chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: RE: [Chrysler300] New Hemi C 300 > >Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400 > > > >Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and > >could > >solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them. > > > >My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even > >asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N. > > > >Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current models? > >Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next > >car show! > > > >Elizabeth Wieland > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Instant Messenger now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to > http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/hotmail_messenger.asp > > > > To send a message to this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 13 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:09:30 -0500 From: "Jim Pristelski" <ajp002@xxxx> Subject: 300L Lens Trim Ring If anyone needs the pot metal trim ring for the 1965 300L grille medallion, I have a nice original one. No pitting, nice chrome, complete with original mounting studs, P/N 2575091, for $125. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Steve Galezowski [mailto:stevenlulu@xxxx] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:45 PM To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Fw: [Chrysler300] 300L Lens Trim Ring Sorry, it was $125. A ridiculous amount for a tiny piece of plastic. But when you need a part........ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 14 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:14:59 -0700 From: "Henry Hopkins" <hhrp@xxxx> Subject: 300G Project on ebay Located in San Diego. Check out photos. Present owner in the club? Looks as if everything is there but still quite a project. And what about the 58 D that has no bids as yet starting out at $15,100? And the 55C300 ending up tomorrow afternoon. Lots of 300's out there suddenly. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 15 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 22:59:03 -0500 From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxx> Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars Hi all; Leonard joined the club some months before the Spencer, NC meet, hosted by Rev. Carl Kreps. He was then retired from Petty Ent., and was instrimental in getting the club access to the racing shops at Petty Ent. The members toured where the public is not allowed, and some of us were lead by Lee Petty, himself. He also got us into Charlotte (Lowe's) Speedway where we had lunch in the private Clubhouse overlooking the track. We were also allowed to park our cars on the sidewalk in front of the Main entrance and had pictures taken there. In add'n, he had Tim Flock there at lunch as a special guest. Tim signed copies of the famous drawing of the 300's side by side on the Daytona bank, some had their dashes/gloveboxes signed. He arranged other things for us, which enhanced Carl's meet, and made it truly special. Lee Petty and Tim flock are gone now and most of us would have never met them had it not been for Leonard, and we all thank him again. These things are the fabric of our meets, most of them special in their own way, and the members who skip them are missing many great experiences. If you haven't made a meet, just do it. I promise you, you'll want to come again! Get those registration forms in, please, and we'll see/meet ya there! Ray Jones, Meet Coordinator > From: cotejohnr@xxxx > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:45:36 EDT > To: ram300@xxxx, Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Chrysler300] '62 300 race cars > > Owen, > The red 300H stock cars of the Bakers were probably backed or owned by > Leonard Berger of North Carolina. I met him last month at AACA Meet in > Greenville, S.C. where I showed my 300B. He told me Buck raced for (with?) > him on Nascar circuit with the "H" 's and that Chrysler had given him a red > 300H for his personal use. He wishes he had it now. > He does not have the original red H that they gave him but now has a Tan > (rare) 300H that he uses and drives to meets. It is an AACA Senior from > several years ago but still very presentable. > He is a member of our Club. Of interest is that he also managed most of the > real estate for the Petty's in N.C. > I helped him with his bags into the hotel for the Greenville AACA Meet. His > room number was....................you guessed it.............Room #300 !!!! > > John R. Cote > CT. > > > To send a message to this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > For list server instructions, go to > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 16 Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 01:15:54 -0400 From: William Huff <whuff@xxxx> Subject: Re: '62 help - Alternators Well said Jeff. However, I would wager that the average home mechanic does not have the proper terminals, nor the proper crimping/staking tools to make connections that will reliably handle the 50+ amps that an alternator charging circuit can carry. The wire size should probably be #10 or #8. Those light duty terminals that one sees in the plastic box kits don't cut it in my opinion. The crimping tools that come with those kits also leave much to be desired. If you spend the money for good components, and use them correctly, then probably crimping alone is ok. What might work ok for short cruises could leave you stranded on a long night trip with headlights, a good stereo and maybe an A/C going if a bad connection exists. Soldering requires a good mechanical connection prior to the soldering taking place, clean connections and a proper technique. Over the years, I have always soldered my crimp connections (after crimping) when I intended that they would become a permanent installation on my boats and also my cars. So far I have been lucky enough to not have any failures from those connections I completed in that manner. Bill Huff At 4/30/03 -0700 03:49 PM, you wrote: > i want to head off the impression that crimping is always a cheap, >poor substitute for soldering which, if done wrong, can itself be a bad >connection. crimping, done with the proper components and correct >tooling is a perfectly acceptable and superior connection method; just >as soldering done wrong can be a lousy connection. > > JEFF > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 17 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 23:17:52 -0700 From: "Moana & Gerry Steinberg" <mopar@xxxx> Subject: Another scam!!!! Hi all: Just received this, sounds like another one of those African scams. Yeh, sure send him a copy of your Driver's License. We may be dumb at times, but not stupid. Beware. Gerry Steinberg, Arizona ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Damara" <damara1@xxxx> To: <mopar@xxxx> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:17 PM Subject: Hello Greetings Friend, First, let me introduce myself, then the essence of this contact. I am Mr Peter Damara, Bank Manager of United Bank For Africa , Capetown Branch. I have urgent and very confidential business proposition for you. On June 6 1998, a gold marchant/contractor with the Randgold Exploration Company, Mr. Jim Smith made a numbered time (Fixed) deposited for twelve calendar months, valued at US$25,000,000.00 (Twenty-five Million Dollars) in my branch. Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to his forwarding address but got no reply. After a month, we sent a reminder and finally we discovered from his contract employers, Randgold Exploration company Ltd that Mr. Jim Smith died from an automobile accident. On further investigation, I found out that he did not leave a WILL and all attempts to trace his next of kin were fruitless. I therefore made further investigation and discovered that Mr. Jim Smith did not declare any next of kin in all his official documents, including his Bank Deposit paperwork. This sum of US$25,000,000.00 is still sitting in the Bank and the interest is being rolled over with the principal sum at the end of each year. No one will come forward to claim it. According to the South African Law, at the expiration of 5 (five) years, the money will revert to the ownership of the South African Government if nobody applies to claim the funds. Consequently, my proposal is that I will like you as a foreigner to stand in as the next of kin to Mr. Jim Smith so that the fruits of this old man's labour will not get into the hands of some corrupt officials. This is simple, I will like you to provide me immediately with your full names and address so that the attorney will prepare the necessary documents and affidavits,which will put you in place as the next of kin. I would also like you to scan you drivers license for me. We shall employ the services of two attorneys for drafting and notarization of the WILL and obtain the necessary documents and letter of probate/administration in your favour for the transfer.A bank account in any part of the world, which you provide, will then facilitate the transfer of this money to you as the beneficiary/next of kin. The money will be paid into your account for us to share in the ratio of 60% for me and 40% for you. There is no risk at all as all the paperwork for this transaction will be done by the attorney and my position as the Branch Manager guarantees the successful execution of this transaction. If you are interested, please reply immediately. Upon your response, I shall then provide you with more details and relevant documents that will help you understand. Please observe utmost confidentiality, and rest assured that this transaction would be most profitable for both of us because I shall require your assistance to invest my share in your country. Awaiting your urgent reply via email. Thanks and regards, Peter Damara ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 18 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:00:33 EDT From: lettercars@xxxx Subject: Re: '62 300 race cars Ray, thanks for bringing up the Spencer meet. It certainly was outstanding. I have all of Tim Flock's talk on tape. Who would have thought he would have been gone just a year or two later? Oh, yes, and then there was the chat with King Richard himself, in the parking lot after the Petty Enterprises tour. (A few of us were still hanging around--- having a little refreshment!) Regarding the Baker race cars. I would certainly doubt they were 300Hs. Why pay for all the extras not needed in a race car----especially that interior? I don't know if any pictures exist of the cars from the rear, but I would be very surprised to see any "Hs" on the deck lids! Maybe someone more knowledgable in old NASCAR stuff could enlighten us on that. Other racing 1962s like Brock's, Granatelli's, and Faubel's were not lettercars. I did buy one of the pictures on ebay referred to. A little fuzzy, as the seller warned, but pretty cool to hang on the wall. 300ly, Gil [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 19 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 06:46:03 -0700 From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxx> Subject: RE: Another scam!!!! To all club members: I would like to add another potential scam. I regularly transact business on E$$BAY and like to use P0 -----Original Message----- From: Moana & Gerry Steinberg [mailto:mopar@xxxx] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 11:18 PM To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Chrysler300] Another scam!!!! Hi all: Just received this, sounds like another one of those African scams. Yeh, sure send him a copy of your Driver's License. We may be dumb at times, but not stupid. Beware. Gerry Steinberg, Arizona ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 20 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 07:35:17 -0700 From: "JOHN MC ADAMS" <clafong@xxxx> Subject: RE: Yet Another scam!!!! To all club members: I would like to add yet another potential scam. (Sorry, I accidentally sent this out before I added the details.) I regularly transact business on E$$BAY and USED to use Paypal (which by the way is now owned by E-Bay). Well recently I received an E-Mail from "someone" which had what looked like an official Paypal logo and a return address of "paysecurity@xxxx" informing me that "Paypal" was conducting a periodic update of members to check their records on inactive accounts and non functioning mailboxes. This E-Mail included a form which asked for my e-mail address, password, name, billing address, credit card number, expiration date, and pin number. I am surprised that they did not also ask for my social security number and my mothers maiden name. This form was a regular html document and did NOT indicate that it was using any form of encryption technology. I immediately sent off an E-Mail to Paypal informing them of this E-Mail and giving them the senders E-Mail address. In searching for scams on the internet, it seems that there have been numerous occurrences of this type of thing recently, with PayPal and other organizations. Bottom line, if anyone asks for any type of personal information ---DO NOT send them anything. Immediately contact the real organization, using the normal internet address that you use to enter their site and notify them that you just received such a request. You might also send an E-Mail to the FBI Internet Fraud Division at http://www1.ifccfbi.gov/index.asp. Check this site out yourself - It looks to be an authentic government site and not yet another scam organization. The bottom line is to always be cautious and suspicious of anyone EVER asking for ANY information from you. Sorry if this sounds paranoid, but you can never be too careful these days. Now to make this post official for the listserver and related to our 300's. I must mention that I love my 1962 Chrysler 300 "Sport" convertible and the weather is getting very nice for taking it out for a drive. Be Careful and happy cruising, John Mc Adams ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 21 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:33:41 -0400 From: "McGuire, Dwight" <dmcguire@xxxx> Subject: RE: `64 ram K conv.gas tank filler neck grommet part no./source Hello to All, I still haven`t had any luck locating a filler neck grommet for the K.....have part #1730087 from John & #2303472 from a local dealer (Louisville,KY) but am being told by three different dealers they are not available through Chrysler. I checked with Year One on a lead but no luck either. Can anyone comfirm this part no. or provide any other sources? I`m itching to take the new addition (my 1st letter car!) on it`s maiden voyage! Thanks in advance, Dwight -----Original Message----- From: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:44 AM To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Chrysler300] Digest Number 612 To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are 9 messages in this issue. Topics in this digest: 1. Fuel Pump Application? From: "Wayne Graefen" <wgraefen@xxxx> 2. Re: New Hemi C 300 From: "Thomas Miller" <tfm@xxxx> 3. RE: New Hemi C 300 From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxx> 4. 300c / "concept" car From: oldeiron@xxxx 5. Re: rear end housing swap From: GERALD OLSON <olson77@xxxx> 6. Carb Question From: pennsy300@xxxx 7. Fw: 300-C parts From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx> 8. 300L Lens Trim Ring From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx> 9. Chrysler 300 Spring Meet From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxx> ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 1 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:13:30 -0500 From: "Wayne Graefen" <wgraefen@xxxx> Subject: Fuel Pump Application? The M2501S Carter fuel pump is the "early" pump for '57 Plymouth, Dodge and DeSoto V8s only, like my '57 DeSoto Firedome. Wayne ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:30:32 -0400 From: "Park Waldrop" <pwald@xxxx> Subject: Fuel Pump Application? Anyone have a Carter fuel pump application list? I have an M2501S pump that appears to be a good rebuildable unit, but don't know what it goes on (came in box of spares for my C cpe). Park Waldrop Atlanta [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:24:05 -0400 From: "Thomas Miller" <tfm@xxxx> Subject: Re: New Hemi C 300 Okay gang, figure it out. The "C" stands for CONCEPT. As far as history goes, I see plenty of it at: http://www.chrysler.com/design/vehicle_design/history/eras/ . Oh, and what about clubs? Try http://www.chrysler.com/design/vehicle_design/car_clubs/ where you'll see the 300 Club Intl. mentioned by name. And, as far as the dealers go, well lots of them are just that. Dealers. Over the years, I found that some are into cars, and some might just as well be selling tractors. I remember very proudly displaying my 300C on the showroom floor of a local Chrysler dealership soon after I purchased it. The General Manager of the dealership is a good friend of mine and knows the heritage of the lettercars. His Sales Manager at the time thought my car was really neat, was glad to have it on the floor next to a '99, but didn't understand the whole letter thing and referred to it as a '57 300M. <grin> Best Regards, Thomas F. Miller tfm@xxxx pageTFM@xxxx / text paging 614.975.4164 / voice 707.667.2601 / eFax 300C, 300M >>> <fastedgie@xxxx> 4/29/2003 12:14:47 AM >>> Why is the new Chrysler a 300 Hemi C????? What has the C got to do with the current name. The letter 'C' in 1957 had a special designation earned as a performance vehicle in a series of Letter cars. These special letter cars became sought after collectibles because of their special impact on the history automobile and in particular to the making of a great company, Chrysler Corporation. But what the hell has the C got to do with the 2005 model year? Especially when the 'C' follows the 'M' car a mass produced non collector car?? It's obvious the current marketers at DCX are right out of touch with reality. They want to capitalize on the marketing value of the Letter Cars, but they fail to see the need to protect the real letter cars from the rank and file. The current management should take a lesson from Chrysler management of the 50's and early 60's. They too saw the value of capitalizing on the Chrysler 300 name. But they protected the letter cars by dropping the letters on the mass produced 300's of that time period. Even Iacocca saw they importance of the special status of the Letter cars by designating the 79 Chrysler 300 as a letterless car., not withstanding what he did to the Charger name. ( Charger 2.2, what a laugh on Dodge's history) The current 300 M should never have been a letter car, it's way too late to fix it. But to go from the 'M' to a 'C' is absolutely senseless and without any marketing advantage. And in common English, it's confusing and alphebetically incorrect. In the future when a 300 Club Member is called upon to explain the special significance of the Letter Cars, he will indeed, have to explain the meaning of stupidity. The unfortunate thing is there is no law against it. Ed Del Grande ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor To send a message to this group, send an email to: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For list server instructions, go to http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ---------- BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 X-GWTYPE:USER FN:"tfm@xxxx".GWIA.Zippynet EMAIL;WORK;PREF:tfm@xxxx N:"tfm@xxxx".GWIA.Zippynet END:VCARD BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 X-GWTYPE:USER FN:Thomas Miller TEL;WORK:614.975.4164 TEL;PREF;FAX:614.263.9913 EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:TFM@xxxx N:Miller;Thomas TITLE:Head Loser END:VCARD [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:41:46 -0400 From: "Wieland, Elizabeth" <EWieland@xxxx> Subject: RE: New Hemi C 300 Seems to me you have all forgotten we have members who work at D-C and could solve the dilemma of the 300C or 300N if one would just ask them. My source who volunteered the information on his own and without my even asking reports the 300C that was in New York will be released as a 300N. Don't you all have better things to do than whine about the current models? Go change your oil, fix your steering box or polish your 300 for the next car show! Elizabeth Wieland ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:47:23 -0500 (EST) From: oldeiron@xxxx Subject: 300c / "concept" car re:Elizabeth Wieland mssg --ditto ! ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:23:53 -0400 From: GERALD OLSON <olson77@xxxx> Subject: Re: rear end housing swap John, I have a 1970 323 surgrip in my 61 wagon. Had to move the spring perches 3/8 in. outboard. Howard Stoll did it for me years ago. Hope lhis helps---Jerry ----- Original Message ----- From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx> Date: Monday, April 28, 2003 11:37 pm Subject: [Chrysler300] rear end housing swap > Thank you all who responded to the bearing question re: rear ends. > Very > informative replies. I can't find the time to answer each one > individually.So - thank you all ! > > Another question, please, to this group: could somebody tell me > specificallywhat rear end assembly, complete, from a later Mopar > without the tapered > axles will fit under, say, a 60 thru 64 Chrysler 300? The few > that I have > measured have had different spacings between the rear spring > perches. I do > know that this swap is do-able, I have seen it done, and, indeed, > my 300G > convert. has such a rear end under it now, but I didn't do it ! > > No, I am not thinking of doing this modification to a Letter car. > But I > would like to do it to my '62 NYker wagon, and would like to > locate and buy, > in a junkyard, a complete suitable rear end asembly. Just not > sure what > matches up... > > Sincerely > John > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -------------------- > -~--> > Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important > Questions.http://us.click.yahoo.com/O10svD/Me7FAA/AG3JAA/8LmulB/TM > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > --~-> > > To send a message to this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > For list server instructions, go to > http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:12:41 EDT From: pennsy300@xxxx Subject: Carb Question I know there was a factory service bulletin concerning hesitation and surging on acceleration for the 300 D. Does this bulletin call for the modification of both carburators, or only the rear, primary carb? And does anybody know of a vendor or source for someone who can perform the required mods? ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:31:43 -0400 From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxx> Subject: Fw: 300-C parts Hi to all, Here you go - 300C parts for sale. Please contact seller directly if any interest, I just rec'd his e-mail, that's all I know... John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Ahern" <doug.ahern@xxxx> To: <crossram@xxxx> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: 300-C parts > > I have some NOS 300-C parts for sale, do you know anyone restoring > a 300-C? I have emblems (side 1/4 panel emblem, grille emblem), a > grille, fenders and a few other items. > > the 300's on your site are very nice. good site! > > Thanks! > Doug Ahern > Athens, GA > ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:33:31 -0400 From: "Steve Galezowski" <stevenlulu@xxxx> Subject: 300L Lens Trim Ring I have a repro trim ring to be installed around the center running light on my L. I understand that these trim rings are prone to fall off. Can anyone offer a recommendation as to the type of adhesive to use to ensure the ring is on the car for a long time? Thanks, Steve Galezowski 65 300L [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 9 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 18:03:13 -0500 From: Ray Jones <hurst300@xxxx> Subject: Chrysler 300 Spring Meet ATTENTION: To all those planning to attend the meet and haven't yet registered or reserved a hotel room. We have received only 17 mail in registrations so far! The Battle Creek Inn, as of today, has received 31 reservations. Reservation deadline is May 21 at hotel. That leaves you 3 weeks! Come on folks, help us out here. We need to get these in as early as possable to ease the load on the office staff. The meet is in 41 days! We expect everyone there!!! It's goona be a good'n. The upcoming NewsFlite will have another registration form included in it. That issue should be out to all members by end of this week or first of next week. Ray Jones, Meet Coordinator Y'all come now, y'hear? ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Message: 22 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 09:45:43 -0700 From: "north lake real estate" <nlre01@xxxx> Subject: 300L grille medallion I need the plastic lens cover for this running light. Can anyone help me out with this. Emblemagic did not seem to have these. I've got the metal piece but someone chose to break the lens cover. I do have all the pieces, maybe there is some way to "glue?" it back together? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network

Archive Sitemap

Copyright � The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.