To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 12 messages in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Penny Brown Hoax
From: "Stragand, Dave" <dave.stragand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
2. Re: replacing trunion with u-joint
From: mr-320@xxxxxxxxx
3. Re: replacing trunion with u-joint
From: News4ge@xxxxxxx
4. Hoaxes, Cryogenics and 61 300 lenses
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
5. 300 Hurst for sale
From: "Dou" <dou4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
6. Re: Hoaxes, Cryogenics and 61 300 lenses
From: "Myles Wallace" <myles1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
7. Re: 63-64 Chrysler front suspention parts
From: "Terry & Emily Lynch" <terrytown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
8. Installing a Mopar deep pan in a dualpump 727.
From: Herman Meiners <herman440@xxxxxxxxx>
9. 1961 Chrysler taillight lenses
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
10. Re: replacing trunion with u-joint
From: JamesPFaber@xxxxxxx
11. Installing a Mopar deep pan in a dualpump 727.
From: Herman Meiners <herman440@xxxxxxxxx>
12. 59 300 E Tail light lenses
From: "Kelly Pierce" <jkrestor300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 09:21:59 -0500
From: "Stragand, Dave" <dave.stragand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Penny Brown Hoax
Fortunately, this is just a hoax. See:
http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/penny.html
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/pennybrown.htm
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blmiss7.htm
... For further information on this hoax.
A quick rule of thumb: Anything, ANYTHING, that says "send this to
everyone you know" is always, ALWAYS a hoax. (This one even says it
twice.)
-Dave
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 07:38:55 -0700 (MST)
From: mr-320@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: replacing trunion with u-joint
lo stranger;
im very interested in the broken trunnion pin as i am in the
business of cryo-treating . ill just bet that the metallurgical fault
you found, in the broken ends of the pin, was a small, roundish nubbin
that abutted the surface just at the break. if so, what it was is an
austenitic inclusion, in the post heat treat martensitic grain structure
of the pin. had the part been cryo-treated [frozen] , the stress riser
induced by this inclusion, would not have existed, it would have been
incorporated into the martensitic grain structure of the pin, and it [in
all probability] would not have broken, because the weak spot didnt
exist any longer, it had been induced, by the cryogenic temperatures, to
complete the transition that heat treating tried to induce on the part
and was only 85-90% successful. cryo-treating brings this success % up
to 99+ . that broken trunnion pin is a perfect example of the type of
metallurgical defects that cryo-treating eliminates. it, of course, does
nothing for mechanical defects, foreign objects, folds in the metal and
pre existing cracks, only austenitic inclusions and their accompanying
stress risers are affected...
JEFF
tucson az.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 09:48:09 EST
From: News4ge@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: replacing trunion with u-joint
We all knew that!
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:17:02 -0500
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Hoaxes, Cryogenics and 61 300 lenses
Thanks Dave, for pointing out yet another Internet hoax. I would like to
grab the moment to remind all of you that the listserver is to be used for
matters pertaining DIRECTLY to Chrysler 300's , ONLY ; period, no
exceptions. If any of the list members feel quite strongly about any other
given topic or subject besides Chrysler 300's, whatever it may be, please
send your e-mails INDIVIDUALLY to the people listed in your private
address
book.
Jeff, if I can find the broken pin ( I might have deep-sixed it by now) ,
I
will gladly send it on to you for your examination. It was clearly a fault
in the metal, visible at the break to the naked eye, even one as untrained
as mine. I must admit most of your note was incomprehensible to me.
Anyway,
how does one determine which parts to have cryo-treated ?
On another 300 note, reproduction 1961 Chrysler taillight lenses will very
soon be available for sale, thru Crossram Motors ; I received a
pre-production sample and OK'd it for production. I expect delivery
within
a week. Members of both Chrysler 300 Clubs will be given first opportunity
at purchasing .
Sincerely
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stragand, Dave" <dave.stragand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 9:21 AM
Subject: [Chrysler300] Penny Brown Hoax
> Fortunately, this is just a hoax. See:
>
> http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/penny.html
> http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/pennybrown.htm
> http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blmiss7.htm
>
> ... For further information on this hoax.
>
> A quick rule of thumb: Anything, ANYTHING, that says "send this to
> everyone you know" is always, ALWAYS a hoax. (This one even says it
> twice.)
>
> -Dave
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:54:24 -0500
From: "Dou" <dou4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 300 Hurst for sale
Good day everyone, spring beeing just around the corner
and the road fever just about to set in, I would like to refresh last
statement that i made last october . I did mentionned that i would have
my Hurst for sale. I announced my intentions to the club membership only.
Before i start to advertise it somewhere else, i would
like to mention it again, giving the club first a chance at it. Anyone
interested can e-mail me for more info and pics dou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or
phone 418 227 6466 or cell 418 225 0706.
Dou
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:48:23 -0500
From: "Myles Wallace" <myles1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hoaxes, Cryogenics and 61 300 lenses
John --
Price on the tail light lenses?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2002 10:17 AM
Subject: [Chrysler300] Hoaxes, Cryogenics and 61 300 lenses
>Thanks Dave, for pointing out yet another Internet hoax. I would like to
>grab the moment to remind all of you that the listserver is to be used
for
>matters pertaining DIRECTLY to Chrysler 300's , ONLY ; period, no
>exceptions. If any of the list members feel quite strongly about any
other
>given topic or subject besides Chrysler 300's, whatever it may be, please
>send your e-mails INDIVIDUALLY to the people listed in your private
address
>book.
>
>Jeff, if I can find the broken pin ( I might have deep-sixed it by now) ,
I
>will gladly send it on to you for your examination. It was clearly a
fault
>in the metal, visible at the break to the naked eye, even one as
untrained
>as mine. I must admit most of your note was incomprehensible to me.
Anyway,
>how does one determine which parts to have cryo-treated ?
>
>On another 300 note, reproduction 1961 Chrysler taillight lenses will
very
>soon be available for sale, thru Crossram Motors ; I received a
>pre-production sample and OK'd it for production. I expect delivery
within
>a week. Members of both Chrysler 300 Clubs will be given first
opportunity
>at purchasing .
>
>Sincerely
>
>John
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Stragand, Dave" <dave.stragand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 9:21 AM
>Subject: [Chrysler300] Penny Brown Hoax
>
>
>> Fortunately, this is just a hoax. See:
>>
>> http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/penny.html
>> http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/pennybrown.htm
>> http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blmiss7.htm
>>
>> ... For further information on this hoax.
>>
>> A quick rule of thumb: Anything, ANYTHING, that says "send this to
>> everyone you know" is always, ALWAYS a hoax. (This one even says it
>> twice.)
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>
>
>
>To send a message to this group, send an email to:
>Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:16:01 -0500
From: "Terry & Emily Lynch" <terrytown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 63-64 Chrysler front suspention parts
I ran into a similar head scratcher when I purchased an idler arm from
PST.
The guy says that the one from a hardtop '64 300 is different from the one
my convertible '64 300 needs. I haven't installed the part yet, but hope
the
one he sold me is the right one. ( I was going to say that I'm waiting for
warmer weather, but I suspect that y'all up north don't want to her that!)
Any thoughts on why the difference?
Joe, did you ever figgure out what the difference between 63 & 64 were?
Terry
'64 300 'vert (sport)
Emily & Terry Lynch
St. Petersburg, FL
E-Mail : lynch813@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelly Pierce" <jkrestor300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 1:08 AM
Subject: [Chrysler300] 63-64 Chrysler front suspention parts
> Hello All!
> Please forgive me if this sounds like a stupid question- But what did
Chrysler change in all the front end parts in 63? Looking in the parts
books
for 63&4 all the part numbers change-such as tie rod ends, idler arm, drag
link etc. Looking at the parts they appear to be the same, but all the
books
say a different part #- even the after market stuff! Can any one explain
what the difference is? And /or why? Thanks, Joe Pierce. Numerous 64's
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> To send a message to this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:18:13 +0100
From: Herman Meiners <herman440@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Installing a Mopar deep pan in a dualpump 727.
I bought and plan on installing the Mopar 727 Deep oilpan kit, but
suddenly it struck me that the oilfilter and spacer of the kit only has
1 oil-inlet for the tranny.
Does someone make / has these spacers with 2 oilholes or should I make
my own spacer?
Also have heard of highflow-filters for 727's. But do they also exist
for dualpump-727's??
Are they worth buying and where can you get these?
Thanks for any advice,
Herman Meiners
The Netherlands
http://drive.to/chrysler
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 17:41:24 -0500
From: John Hertog <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 1961 Chrysler taillight lenses
Myles and all others,
Here is a copy of the ad which will be appearing in the next publications.
At this time, I am NOT ready to fill orders. Should be another week or two
at the most. I will let y'all know.
Please do not send in orders yet.
Pictures of the lenses can be viewed at :
http://www.crossrams.com/lenses/61/61lenses.html
Thanks,
John
> NEW , very limited quantity: 1961 Chrysler taillight
> lenses and gaskets;
> correct and high quality reproductions , licensed
> Daimler / Chrysler
> manufacturer. $225
> per pair to Chrysler 300 Club members, Plus $20
> insured shipping / handling
> within USA. Personal checks or Paypal welcome To
> order, please contact John
> Hertog : crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx or phone (631)
> 725-5603 or fax ( 631)
> 725-8052
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:27:57 EST
From: JamesPFaber@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: replacing trunion with u-joint
He wasn't blowing smoke, cryogenic metal treatment works. Ask many of the
expert rifle shooters about better accuracy and barrel life.
Jim Faber
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 11
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 03:04:51 +0100
From: Herman Meiners <herman440@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Installing a Mopar deep pan in a dualpump 727.
I bought and plan on installing the Mopar 727 Deep oilpan kit, but
suddenly it struck me that the oilfilter and spacer of the kit only has
1 oil-inlet for the tranny.
Does someone make / has these spacers with 2 oilholes or should I make
my own spacer?
Also have heard of highflow-filters for 727's. But do they also exist
for dualpump-727's??
Are they worth buying and where can you get these?
Thanks for any advice,
Herman Meiners
The Netherlands
http://drive.to/chrysler
Sorry if this email enters the list twice, I'm not sure it worked the
first time.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:09:52 -0700
From: "Kelly Pierce" <jkrestor300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 59 300 E Tail light lenses
Greetings group!
I have a pair of NOS tail light lenses for 59 Chryslers that a friend
has. Part # 1860798 group 8-55-195. They are not cheap. They are in as
near perfect condition as you will find, and they are in original
boxes,but dusty as he opened the boxes, set them on a shelf in his body
shop in the opened boxes so they got dusty. I thought I would see if any
one in the club w/ a 59 300 E or other model would want them before I put
them on ebay. Email me if interested, they go as a pair for $275.00 Plus
shipping. They are original Mopar parts, not reproductions or aftermarket.
I don't know off hand if these are hard to find or not, I don't recall
seeing a pair on ebay in the last year or so in my searches, so tell me if
this is out of line or not. I am selling them for him and he told me that
is what he paid for them 2 years ago for his 59 Saratoga but traded the
car for a 60 Saratoga so he doesn't have a need for them now. Joe Pierce
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network
Archive Sitemap