[Chrysler300] Digest Number 171
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Chrysler300] Digest Number 171



To send a message to this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For list server instructions, go to
http://www.chrysler300club.com/yahoolist/inst.htm 

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Chrysler300-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are 7 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

      1. Manifold Heat Control Valve
           From: "Myles Wallace" <myles1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
      2. heat risers
           From: "PaddyCaddy ." <paddycaddy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
      3. heat risers 2
           From: "crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      4. 2002 Calenders
           From: paulholm <paulholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      5. Re: heat risers 2
           From: MOPARMAN3@xxxxxxx
      6. heat risers
           From: "PaddyCaddy ." <paddycaddy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
      7. Heat Riser debate
           From: "Kelly Pierce" <jkrestor300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1
   Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:30:25 -0500
   From: "Myles Wallace" <myles1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Manifold Heat Control Valve

Folks --

 What's the impact of the lack of manifold heat control valves or heat
risers
I believed there called. My G has the valve shafts cut off to the manifold
and
obviously missing the associated left and right thermostats and hardware.



I have also seen this on several other older cars over the years.  In my
case
I have noticed the engine takes several minutes to warm up - result of the
valves
missing?

Are there other issues to consider?   Haven't looked into yet -- these
valves
available to re-install?  

Regards --
Myles 
http://www.nauticom.net


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2
   Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:26:41 -0500
   From: "PaddyCaddy ." <paddycaddy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: heat risers

In my personal opinion, heat risers were always a stupid idea - unless you

live in Alaska, Newfoundland, or Finland and drive your car to work every 
morning !

The effect they have on heating up your engine a minute or two earlier is 
not worth the risk to same when they sieze shut and block your exhaust.
And 
trust me they are famous for doing just that.  If it does, you'll be lucky

to escape with just a cracked manifold...   and you probably will be
unaware 
that it had siezed shut until it damages something -  Like your exhaust 
valves !

I would include this only for a show car.

I put a grade 8 nut and bolt thru mine once I hammered the butterfly out
of 
it on my 1969 Cadillac.   My 1970 Cadillac runs - and warms - just fine 
despite never having one of these.  1970 models simply did not have them, 
thankfully..

I trust the same applies to Chryslers.



_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 3
   Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:17:13 -0500
   From: "crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <crossram@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: heat risers 2

Paddycaddy, I would beg to disagree. Heat risers have an important
function on carbureted engines - they make the chokes come off a lot
sooner than without them. Talking mostly about crossram engines, the lack
of heat riser invariably results in fouled plugs from overly rich carbs at
warm-up. 

Like  anything else, heat risers should be maintained - sprayed with heat
riser lube once ever couple years or so . Of course, with no maintenance,
they seize up and rust in place. 

For those of us who don't live in warmer climates, chokes are necessary to
our car's operation. Without chokes, the car bucks and stalls when cold.
With chokes and no heat risers, the car will tend to  fouls plugs. With
both the chokes connected, and the heat risers working the way they
should, the car will work well both when hot and when cold.

I have seen too many ram cars, especially, with no heat risers, or with
the things jammed open . Owners wonder why the cars are cranky. Every ram
car I have rebuilt has had the heat risers rebuilt as well, and the result
has always been worth the extra work. 

John





--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 4
   Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:50:45 -0500
   From: paulholm <paulholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 2002 Calenders

I saw where the Forwardlook mailing list has a 2002 calendar
they printed up. I saw one of the 2001 calendars and was impressed
with the work. PLENTY of information and nice pictures.

They can be previewed and ordered at this site

http://www.forwardlook.net/calendar2002/index.html

I have NO personal interests in this endeavor.

-- 
Paul Holmgren
Hoosier Corps #33, L-6
2 57 300-C's in Indy


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 5
   Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:35:00 EST
   From: MOPARMAN3@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: heat risers 2

I would like to add  to John's comment one other scenario, and that is
carb 
icing. Lack of heat, coupled with the right atmospheric conditions, ( cool

damp day), fuel evaporation (which also absorbs heat), and manifold 
vacuum....all this makes ice under the throttle blades which causes
stalling, 
and poor throttle response. think of the liabilities Chrysler would incur 
from lawsuits from accidents...just ask Ford. 
       Water heat is an option, with some inventive plumbing...but not
stock 
looking. The best choice is fix'em and maintain them with the Mopar heat 
riser lube you can buy at the dealer....if you are racing or whatever you
can 
always wire it open till you are done racing . dan


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 6
   Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 00:37:10 -0500
   From: "PaddyCaddy ." <paddycaddy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: heat risers


   I agree that the chokes - obviously - will adjust back to "normal" a
bit 
slower just as the engine will warm a bit slower.

   But I'm not sure what would make the plugs foul.  Applying this theory 
that plugs foul if the the engine does not immediately warm up would
suggest 
that the higher fuel/air mixture needed while the engine is still cold
would 
regularly foul plugs in colder climates where the engines obviously would 
take much longer to warm to operating temperature - especially this time
of 
year(or in August for our compadres down under).

   Except for show cars, and for those seeking optimal performance and 
especially less risk, I still say that the restriction in the exhaust and 
the very real potential for siezing still outwieghs these other concerns.

   Purposely restricting exhaust flow just strikes me as a crazy idea from

the getgo - especially in a crossram.  Jamming/reversing hot, dirty
exhaust 
gases back into the manifold and greatly increasing back pressure back 
toward the combustion chamber I suspect wreaks far more havoc (exhaust 
valves?) than whatever damage may or not be done by not forcing the engine

to warm a minute or two earlier.



_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 7
   Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 22:54:10 -0700
   From: "Kelly Pierce" <jkrestor300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Heat Riser debate

I have to add my 2 cents worth here. Imagine buying a new 2002 300 M and
the computer does not make adjustments in fuel delivery for a cold engine
start / run situation- It stalls, bucks and snorts until the engine warms
up at least part way- A instantly mad consumer who could sue the pants off
of the dealer, D-C and anyone else he can think of. I have owned over 300
Chrysler Products ranging in years from 1959 to 1998. I have had many that
were "COLD BLOODED" and it usually came from choke /pull-off adjustments
being required, plugged exhaust cross over passages, and many times seized
up, damaged, removed etc. heat risers! In the great white north, Rocky
Mountain west, Rainy Seattle, Windy Chicago, New England if you want to
drive your car anytime but the 4th of July you need the heat riser
functioning correctly. Plugs foul out from too rich mixture too long,
drivability sucks and engine life suffers. Leave it working, maintain it,
repair/replace it but leave it as the engineers designed it . Unless you
are racing a fully prepared race engine where you really don't need one it
is a needed item!
               Joe Pierce 300 K and 64 Chrysler fanatic..


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


<<attachment: winmail.dat>>



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network Archive Sitemap


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.