Re: [FWDLK] 58 vs. 59 $$$$

["John Bartell" <jrbartell@xxxxxxx>]

        Could be, but, even when comparing a 59 "Sport" Fury to a 58 Fury there
is still an $873 difference.  I think the angle of regional pricing
plays a big part.  I know East Coast prices on most everything else is
much higher today, than it is here in the Midwest.
        I don't have a printing date on either list, but the 59 list has a
calendar on it starting with Nov 58.  I would assume it was printed late
58.

van Hoy wrote:
>
> Maybe it's because they dropped the model names a notch in '59, so the '59
> Fury was actually a Belvedere and the Savoy was actually a Plaza, etc.?

> >and if you compare the '59 Sport Fury $2,927.25 to the '58 Fury
> >$3,800.00
 WI
> >