Re: IML: Tune Up Edelbrock v. AFB
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: Tune Up Edelbrock v. AFB



Hi Chris

No, It wasn't a typo. We calculated the speed based on how many RPMs
it was turning, since we know the final drive ratio. My friend who was
driving is a 29 year old mechanical engineer. He is one of the most
interesting car people I have ever met. He has only ever owned one car
himself, but has driven many over the last few years. Currently they
are driving his wifes honda while he hotrods his 73 VW Super Beetle.
It now has porsche brakes and wheels, and a 1600 CC engine with twin
webber carburators. It's a nice machine. It's almost finished. I let
him drive the Imperial in his wedding actualy. There are some
interesting pictures of the bride and groom leaving and burning out in
it after the dance, if anyone wants to see them :-)  The car got a lot
of attention from the wedding party.

I am quite certain of the speed we calculated about 143.6 or
something. I asked Colin about it today, and he said 143.6.

It is not really a stock Imperial, I guess, but it is close to stock

The thremoquad is a good carb, but it combined with lean burn, or
Mopar CAS or one of their other  emition systems of the 70s it can be
a nightmare. Also if the air door on the seccondary barrels is not
adjusted once in a while it  gets slack, and causes horrid performance
problems.

A manual choke is also a good idea with thermoquads, although they do
work fairly well with an automatic choke.

-Hailey






On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:09:55 -0800, Christopher Hoffman
<imperial67@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Was 143 a typo? I doubt a '68 Imperial would do 143 mph without some major
> modification (and a fair portion of insanity on the part of all aboard). I
> imagine the engine could not overcome the aerodynamic drag of the body, and
> that would be a good thing since the rear-axle lift at that speed would
> probably cause uncontrollable fishtailing or at least dangerous instability.
> 
> I know D^2 likes to drive fast, but not even he'd go that fast in a 40yo
> Imperial (I hope)! I've spent some time on Germany's Autobahns, so I know
> what 143 (or 155) feels like. I've even done 145 in a diesel-powered sedan.
> But each time I was in a modern German car (and a couple of MB prototypes)
> with excellent aerodynamics and modern chassis designs.
> 
> So please tell us how fast you were really going, assuming that was a typo
> (or how you measured 143)! It gives me renewed respect for the Thermoquad
> (which can't seem to get my NYB up to highway speed the way my '67's Carter
> AFB can).
> 
> Safe motoring and happy thanksgiving to all!
> 
> --
> Chris in LA
> 67 Crown
> 78 NYB Salon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/24/04 1:23 pm, Hailey (Morgan) Moore (materialgurl@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> > I have been in the convertible doing 143 MPH on the highway, although
> > I have never driven it that fast personaly.
> 
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> 
>


-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.