IML: torqueflite nonsense
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IML: torqueflite nonsense
- From: "mike sutton" <mikanlin62@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:57:31 -0700
The changes in the 727 over the years were few, not to go into the detail
to list them all but there was a change in the number of splines on the
input shaft around 65, the front clutch bushing was made a bit wider
around 71 or 72, the valve body had changes along the way to reflect the
difference in cable shift linkage versus non cable, the part throttle
downshift was added at some point , in the mid 70s the angle of the
planetary gears was changed slightly, there were others and Im sure someone
will call attention to something I missed or some other bit of trivia.
Unless you are flat out going for high horsepower applications, and I mean
double or more than the factory was delivering, youre not going to see any
serious differences in what a 78 or a 74 or a 67 or whatever year of
aluminum case 727 can handle. They were more than robust enough to handle
the torque and horsepower that was being sent to them, and even the much
maligned lock up versions had problems with the TORQUE CONVERTER more than
the transmission itself.
Dont take my word for it though since I can only speak from experience in
repairing and rebuilding the silly things over the years, as well as seeing
first hand the kinds of race use that basically stock transmissions are
capable of taking with only the most basic mods done to them.
Mikey
62 Crown Coupe
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network