on 19/04/04 14:48, David.Whitney@xxxxxxxx at David.Whitney@xxxxxxxx wrote: > Matt -- > > I'm right there with you, man. While none of us buy Imperials for the > mpg, I was pleased to see 29 mpg on the freeway if I keep my foot out of > it, 26 at 70mph and 23 at 80mph. This is the 3.3l in a '91 with 4-speed > automatic OD. That's the result of a computer that tries to run lean at > everthing except WOT and restricts the air intake so you can't make it run > lean when the throttle bodies are supplying max fuel. My overall mileage > is 22.8 with 80 percent freeway miles. > > 201ci is a small engine, and 150hp is not a lot in a 3,500 pound car. > Those are new style hp. If I wanted hp to weight ratio like the old days, > I'd need 230 new style. I have a plan, so stay tuned... > I went from Virginia to Florida and then Louisiana 2 weeks ago. My best score was 27MPG at an average 70 MPH. So, I guess it's not too bad for the 3,8 liters? -Laurent. -- ============================================================================ Laurent Daudelin AIM/iChat: LaurentDaudelin <http://nemesys.dyndns.org> Logiciels Nemesys Software mailto:laurentdaudelin@xxxxxxxxxxx