on 19/04/04 14:48, David.Whitney@xxxxxxxx at David.Whitney@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> Matt --
>
> I'm right there with you, man. While none of us buy Imperials for the
> mpg, I was pleased to see 29 mpg on the freeway if I keep my foot out of
> it, 26 at 70mph and 23 at 80mph. This is the 3.3l in a '91 with 4-speed
> automatic OD. That's the result of a computer that tries to run lean at
> everthing except WOT and restricts the air intake so you can't make it run
> lean when the throttle bodies are supplying max fuel. My overall mileage
> is 22.8 with 80 percent freeway miles.
>
> 201ci is a small engine, and 150hp is not a lot in a 3,500 pound car.
> Those are new style hp. If I wanted hp to weight ratio like the old days,
> I'd need 230 new style. I have a plan, so stay tuned...
>
I went from Virginia to Florida and then Louisiana 2 weeks ago. My best
score was 27MPG at an average 70 MPH. So, I guess it's not too bad for the
3,8 liters?
-Laurent.
--
============================================================================
Laurent Daudelin AIM/iChat: LaurentDaudelin <http://nemesys.dyndns.org>
Logiciels Nemesys Software mailto:laurentdaudelin@xxxxxxxxxxx