Working Imperials
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Working Imperials



My wife is a professional photographer and we are looking to use our 1962 crown 
4d ht for bride and groom transport and for location portraiture.

Mike & Karen
1962 4d crown HT
1949 Chrysler Windsor
1960 Linclon premiere
--

--------- Original Message ---------

DATE: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 23:54:45 
From: "Hugh & Therese" <hugtrees@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Imperial Mailing List" <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 

>Inspired by a new member who acquired his 58 to be a wedding limousine, I
>was wondering who else might be using their car to make a little money.  I
>need some ideas, essentially, to try to convince my colleagues at the museum
>that the 58 is not just a money pit.  My problem is compounded by the fact
>that the museum has other more suitable vehicles in better condition for use
>in parades and weddings.  The 58, a four door hard top might be suitable as
>a substitute in bad weather, but I am in San Antonio and without working
>A/C, it would not be very accommodating.  I did use the 58 once at a senior
>prom once.  It turned out to be a popular decision - do you know how many
>seniors you can cram into an Imperial?  A fun night, but I did it as a
>favor, and I'd have to get a license to compete, and I suspect the car would
>probably be subject to vigorous inspection which it could not pass.  Film
>work is out of the question.  Any vehicle we have rented out for that
>purpose came back with so damaged the costs to repair them out weighed any
>gain, not to mention the horror of it all.
>
>If anyone is using their Imperial as a working vehicle, I'd sure like to
>hear about it.  Mine is not in any danger.  I'm am looking for support in
>getting it worked on.  I have two persons lined up to help with the
>mechanical work, and, frankly, I am very keen to get started.  I have never
>removed an engine before.  I will be starting right at the head of the food
>chain with the 392, which is not called the whale for nothing.  I recently
>saw one on a stand at a museum not too far from me and it was quite awe
>inspiring.  I am quite content with the car's lack of practicality, the
>absurdity of it, but I'd like to give the impression that there is some
>logic, however tenuous, in the undertaking.
>
>There is also an outside chance that a certain dealership chain owner, quite
>well known nationally, might be persuaded to underwrite the work.  He has
>two Chrysler dealerships in this town alone.  What would be helpful is some
>good  . . . the list filters would refuse the word I am thinking of, but its
>initials are BS . . . some high quality BS, like his sales people use to
>shift product, to either impress him with my nerve or make him laugh, or
>both.  He is a member of the museum, and kind of likes my chutzpah - sorry
>if I mangled that spelling - and he just might go for it if asked in just
>the right way.
>
>Hugh
>
>
>
>


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.