68 sedan or hardtop? was 68 4 door sedans out there?.

[Mark McDonald <tomswift@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

D2, thanks for your response but I already knew about the physical differences
between the sedan and the hardtop.  What I meant was, having owned both, what
is the major difference from a driver's perspective?  Is there any reason to
like one over the other?

The real reason I'm asking is, I've thought of buying a sedan but wonder if
it's worth it since the hardtop & the sedan are so similar.  However, I've
liked the solid feel of every sedan I've ridden in . . .

Mark

"D. Dardalis" wrote:

> Mark
> Although I am not Ron, I can give you my perspective on this.  The main
> difference is that the seats are more basic on the sedan.  There is one
> bench seat on the front, and it all moves as one when the power seat switch
> is applied.  On my LeBaron, there are two individual six way power seats
> (same as the more basic hard top).  However, in both cars the seats are
> quite comfortable.  Other than that and the B-pillar, the two cars are
> identical.  Which I like the most?  Well, the LeBaron has leather seats in
> nice shape while my sedan has non-original vinyl that is mostly worn
> out.   Overall, the LeBaron is in better shape inside and out, and this is
> the car I drive more frequently.  So, the reasons are more connected to the
> condition rather than the model differences.  I cannot comment on the
> hardtop feeling yet since I have not fixed the windows of the LeBaron
> yet.  However, my Sedan has a considerable stronger upper end due to some
> engine mods, and if I was to race a high performance sports car, I would be
> better off driving my sedan!  Also, the sedan has limited slip, so it will
> be better in the snow and ice.
> D^2, 2x68s
>