-------------- Original message from Bill Longest <billlongest@xxxxxxxxx>: --------------
> I could not help but notice a 1980 Imperial mentioned
> in the "review: of the 1969. I guess the 1980 was a
> bad year for Imperial, since it was not produced for
> that model year. You would think Time CNN would check
> the facts.
> --- YBSHORE@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> >
> > Kenyon,
> >
> > Should this rumor turn out to be true, as a
> > fellow Imperialist who
> > didn't have the luxury to see far, far into the
> > future, as it were, I am
> > inquiring that , given the opportunity,
> > should/would/did a pre-nup specifically
> > concern the Imperials?
> >
> > Congratulations!!
> >
> > Jack
> >
&g t; > In a message dated 9/9/2007 2:37:04 P.M. Eastern
> > Daylight Time,
> > imperialken@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> >
> > Kenyon,
> >
> > It seems to me that this is just one guys opinion of
> > the cars "he" doesn't
> > like. Some of them are quite interesting cars.
> >
> > The other thing I find interesting is that the day
> > after your wedding, you
> > have time to get on-line for this stuff. ;-)
> >
> > Ken
> > 67 Crown 4 Dr Ht
> > 68 LeBaron 4 Dr Ht
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************************** See what's
> > new at http://www.aol.com
> >
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> ____
> Luggage? GPS? Comic books? > Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
> http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz
>
> ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>