Re: IML: CNN's 50 - which Imperials Made the list? Kenyon?

[Bill Longest <billlongest@xxxxxxxxx>]

I could not help but notice a 1980 Imperial mentioned
in the "review: of the 1969. I guess the 1980 was a
bad year for Imperial, since it was not produced for
that model year.  You would think Time CNN would check
the facts.
--- YBSHORE@xxxxxxx wrote:

>  
> Kenyon,
>     
>     Should this rumor  turn out to be true, as a 
> fellow Imperialist who 
> didn't have the luxury to see far, far into the 
> future, as it were, I am  
> inquiring that , given the opportunity, 
> should/would/did a pre-nup  specifically 
> concern the  Imperials?
>  
> Congratulations!!
>  
> Jack
>  
> In a message dated 9/9/2007 2:37:04 P.M. Eastern 
> Daylight Time, 
> imperialken@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> 
> Kenyon,
> 
> It seems to me that this is just one guys opinion of
> the  cars "he" doesn't
> like.  Some of them are quite interesting  cars.
> 
> The other thing I find interesting is that the day
> after your  wedding, you
> have time to get on-line for this stuff. ;-)
> 
> Ken
> 67  Crown 4 Dr Ht
> 68 LeBaron 4 Dr Ht
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************** See what's
> new at http://www.aol.com
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Luggage? GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz

-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm