Re: IML: 56 Ignition Problem
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: 56 Ignition Problem
- From: randalpark@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 12:40:42 -0500
THAT'S TO SAY DON'T CRANK THE ENGINE OVER IN THE MEANTIME. Sorry
everyone!
Paul W.
-----Original Message-----
From: randalpark@xxxxxxx
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 4:55 AM
Subject: Re: IML: 56 Ignition Problem
Burned points can also result from touching the contact surfaces with
your fingers. Any oil or lube from the rubbing block will also burn
them prematurely. Clean the surfaces thoroughly if in doubt, especially
if buying NOS parts from someplace. Who knows how many times they have
been out of the box and handles by some lunck head before selling them
to you.
They can LOOK pretty bad and still work. Could you poor performance be
due to them being improperly gapped? The setting is .015 - .018 and
they both need to be the same. That can be tricky on the dual point
distributor. They have to be gapped separately and only when each set
is fully planted on a ridge at the rubbing block.
Normal point life is about 15,000 miles. Once you have done it a few
times it isn't too bad. On '55 and '56 it is easier to remove the
distributor since you then have control over the position of the point
sets in relation to the rubbing block. Accuracy is imperative. Also,
with the distributor mounted on the back of the motor at 15 years old I
had no trouble crawling around under there, but at 55, its not easy.
Just mark everything so you know where it should be when your done, and
crank the engine over in the meantime.
Paul W.
-----Original Message-----
From: a292@xxxxxxx
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: IML: 56 Ignition Problem
The ballast resistor is there to limit current. The voltage drop is
simply a side effect of the limited current that the ballast allows to
pass through. It's the limited current that prolongs the life of the
points.
Any resistor will show the same voltage on both sides until a load is
applied. It's sort of like if you connect a garden hose with a spray
nozzle on the end to a spigot. You can hold the spray nozzle open and
turn the spigot on until there is just a trickle of water coming out of
the nozzle. The pressure in the hose is very low. Now turn the spigot
off and the pressure in the hose will build up until it matches the
pressure in the pipe supplying the spigot. Turn the nozzle back on and
the pressure in the hose rapidly drops again. A similar thing is
happening with the voltage in your ignition system except that it
happens almost instantaneously. A big difference in the ignition system
is that unlike the garden hose which will briefly allow a large
quantity of water through the nozzle, the ballast will not allow a
large flow of current to pass through. I'm not very good at explaining
it and that's not the greatest analogy but I hope it makes since.
In any case I would try a different condenser. I have had a bad
condenser in the past and the engine would still run but not very well
and it causes a LOT of excessive arcing across the points when they
open which will fry them in short order. Also the output voltage of the
coil will be very low which is why the engine will run so roughly. The
job of the condenser is to allow the magnetic field in the coil to
collapse in a controlled manner. It allows the voltage in the primary
windings to rapidly but not instantaneously fall. It's this collapsing
of the voltage and hence the magnetic field which produces the high
voltage in the secondary windings to fire the plugs.
Have a good day
Brad
On Feb 6, 2007, at 5:17 PM, Jeff Cantor wrote:
Brad,
Thanks for the suggestion although it has me puzzled. I was under the
> impression that when electrical systems went from 6V to 12V in the >
mid-50s, the ignition systems were kept at around 6V to avoid having >
to beef up the points. If there is still supposed to be 12V across >
open points, then you're going to have much greater arching across >
those points as they close hence the damage that I've observed. >
Wouldn't 6V across those open points produce less arching and >
therefore less damage?
Jeff
'56 Sedan
Trenton, NJ
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply
to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with
everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm ;
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply
to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with
everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm ;
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
=0
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network