Thank you for all your interest. Once all the responses have come in we can add up all the rotors that people need and I can give a price based on this volume. These rotors are not going to be cheap for the main reason that the volume is not high and it will be a part number where the volumes are going down. The tooling cost for rotors is the main cost for small runs because the pattern and engineering that go into it is quite complex. We would need a sample and I want to thank Ken for volunteering a rotor. We would only need to borrow it for a week I believe. Does anyone know if this rotor has an AIMCO number (maybe in the shop manual). This was the standard numbering system for rotors. Thanks
Regards,
Shaun Shroff
Durabrake Co.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Lang
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 7:42 AM
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: IML: Budd brakes on C bodies and also rotor specs
The DuraBrake Co. is local to me so I can volunteer one of the rotors from my ’67 as a model. The rotor is still in good shape, plus we have the specs from the shop manual.
Ken
’67 Crown 4 drht
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Frederick Joslin
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 7:15 AM
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: IML: Budd brakes on C bodies and also rotor specs
1) I believe that very few 1967- 1969 C-bodies came with front discs vs. all of the 1967-1969 Imperials so rotor availability is less of an issue and there is a relatively easy swap to post Budd brake systems for these cars if you choose.
2) Assuming that we go through with the purchase of the new lot of Budd rotors, what specs will the manufacturer use? Does anyone have an NOS rotor that can be used.
Fred Joslin