Thank you for all your interest. Once all
the responses have come in we can add up all the rotors that people need and I
can give a price based on this volume. These rotors are not going to be cheap
for the main reason that the volume is not high and it will be a part number
where the volumes are going down. The tooling cost for rotors is the main cost
for small runs because the pattern and engineering that go into it is quite
complex. We would need a sample and I want to thank Ken for volunteering a
rotor. We would only need to borrow it for a week I believe. Does anyone know
if this rotor has an AIMCO number (maybe in the shop manual). This was the
standard numbering system for rotors. Thanks Regards, Shaun Shroff Durabrake Co. From:
mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ken Lang The DuraBrake Co. is local to me so I can
volunteer one of the rotors from my ’67 as a model. The rotor is
still in good shape, plus we have the specs from the shop manual. Ken ’67 Crown 4 drht From:
mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Frederick Joslin 1) I
believe that very few 1967- 1969 C-bodies came with front discs vs. all of the
1967-1969 Imperials so rotor availability is less of an issue and there is a
relatively easy swap to post Budd brake systems for these cars if you choose. 2)
Assuming that we go through with the purchase of the new lot of Budd
rotors, what specs will the manufacturer use? Does anyone have an NOS rotor that
can be used. |